Re: glib inconsistencies in testing

2008-07-21 Thread Loïc Minier
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008, Frank Küster wrote: > *** This build of Glib was compiled with glib 2.16.4, but is currently > running with 2.16.3, which is too old. We'll continue, but expect problems! If it does make any difference, then you should be bumping the build-dep to >= 2.16.4. glib's symbol

Re: glib inconsistencies in testing

2008-07-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 05:57:26PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Actually, the bug is that libglib-perl is second-guessing glib's package > > dependencies and spitting out warnings that it shouldn't. > And it's already reported? Well, I don't see it o

Re: glib inconsistencies in testing

2008-07-20 Thread Frank Küster
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, the bug is that libglib-perl is second-guessing glib's package > dependencies and spitting out warnings that it shouldn't. And it's already reported? Thanks, Frank -- Frank Küster Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: glib inconsistencies in testing

2008-07-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:41:34PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > since a couple of days ago, I keep getting this message on a lenny > system during the configure phase of (seemingly) arbitrary packages: > Setting up samba-common (2:3.0.31-1) ... > *** This build of Glib was compiled with glib 2.16

glib inconsistencies in testing

2008-07-20 Thread Frank Küster
Hi, since a couple of days ago, I keep getting this message on a lenny system during the configure phase of (seemingly) arbitrary packages: Setting up samba-common (2:3.0.31-1) ... *** This build of Glib was compiled with glib 2.16.4, but is currently running with 2.16.3, which is too old. We'l