Re: gdk-imlib1 may yet live (was Re: Removing GNOME 1 (was Re: orbit2cpp

2005-09-27 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Steve Langasek wrote (in reference to gdk-imlib1): >>No, there isn't. It should only need to be rebuilt against the newer >>libpng. > Ah, excellent news. Why wasn't this done *before* removing libpng10? > Because the imlib package maintainer is drop

gdk-imlib1 may yet live (was Re: Removing GNOME 1 (was Re: orbit2cpp

2005-09-27 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Steve Langasek wrote (in reference to gdk-imlib1): >No, there isn't. It should only need to be rebuilt against the newer >libpng. Ah, excellent news. Why wasn't this done *before* removing libpng10? Because the imlib package maintainer is dropping them and nobody else understood the state of the