Re: gdbm and libc6

e status of lib gdbm and libc6 ? . Htdig uses gdbm > but libc6 provides db and sometime ago I'seen a post of Ulrich > Drepper (glibc maintener), he said that he was unable to find a > maintainer for ligdbm. So is gdbm offcialy dropped for hamm ? > should I port htdig to use db i

Re: gdbm and libc6

> It's not officially dropped, it's just not currently maintained; I don't > think there's any plan to drop it totally. Umm, it's not maintained *upstream*; I maintain the debian package. It is worth porting the code to use db, even using the dbm-style interfaces, but since there's no data-level

Re: gdbm and libc6

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - what is the status of lib gdbm and libc6 ? . Htdig uses gdbm but > libc6 provides db and sometime ago I'seen a post of Ulrich Drepper (glibc > maintener), he said that he was unable to find a

gdbm and libc6

Hi developpers, I'm planning to package htdig, a www search engine (http://htdig.sdsu.edu/). I have two questions : - is someone already working on this package ? - what is the status of lib gdbm and libc6 ? . Htdig uses gdbm but libc6 provides db and som