On la, 2007-12-15 at 00:34 +0300, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> Thank You for the link, however I consider my proposal actual
> nevertheless. Because using of testing area will provide some guarantees
> for the gcc-snapshot package to be workable.
Having packages in testing that are not meant for th
On 14/12/2007, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> Thank You for the link, however I consider my proposal actual
> nevertheless. Because using of testing area will provide some
> guarantees for the gcc-snapshot package to be workable.
I guess testing users needing gcc-snapshot are likely to have either a
>> I needed to test the building of one of my packages with gcc4.3.
>> However it turns out that gcc-snapshot from unstable contains the critical
>> bug, which makes impossible using it. At the same time the previous
>> version of the gcc-snapshot deb-package has been already deleted from
>> unstab
On Friday 14 December 2007, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
Hi,
> I needed to test the building of one of my packages with gcc4.3.
> However it turns out that gcc-snapshot from unstable contains the critical
> bug, which makes impossible using it. At the same time the previous
> version of the gcc-snap
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 22:38:56 +0300, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> I needed to test the building of one of my packages with gcc4.3.
> However it turns out that gcc-snapshot from unstable contains the critical
> bug, which makes impossible using it. At the same time the previous
> version of the g
I needed to test the building of one of my packages with gcc4.3.
However it turns out that gcc-snapshot from unstable contains the critical
bug, which makes impossible using it. At the same time the previous
version of the gcc-snapshot deb-package has been already deleted from
unstable.
As a resul
6 matches
Mail list logo