Robert Edmonds wrote:
> i'd like to get some feedback on whether i should implement some changes
> in the unbound debian packaging:
i'm also looking into building the python bindings for libunbound.
unfortunately upstream uses autotools / libtool to build and link the
python module, which results
On 02/17/2011 09:46 AM, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> let me rephrase: the resolvconf options would be enabled by default, but
> would be no-ops unless resolvconf is installed. and i think the package
> would only Suggest: resolvconf.
thanks.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-
17.02.2011 07:07, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> hi,
>
> i'd like to get some feedback on whether i should implement some changes
> in the unbound debian packaging:
>
> * integration with resolvconf as a provider of recursive DNS
> resolution. (#562031)
>
> * retrieving a list of upstream
On 2011-02-17, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 02/17/2011 05:07 AM, Robert Edmonds wrote:
>> i'm inclined to implement all three of these features and make them each
>> individually toggle-able via /etc/default/unbound, and to enable these
>> features by default
>
> in order to do that for the first tw
On 02/17/2011 05:07 AM, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> i'm inclined to implement all three of these features and make them each
> individually toggle-able via /etc/default/unbound, and to enable these
> features by default
in order to do that for the first two that involve resolvconf, does that
mean you'
hi,
i'd like to get some feedback on whether i should implement some changes
in the unbound debian packaging:
* integration with resolvconf as a provider of recursive DNS
resolution. (#562031)
* retrieving a list of upstream recursive DNS servers from
resolvconf and automatic
6 matches
Mail list logo
