Re: flavours and modules: /lib confusion

2001-12-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Guy Geens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.28.1648 +0100]: > This was a bug in kernel-package, but it should be fixed now. > > (kernel-package 7.75) okay, i got 7.76 yesterday because of the failure to build kernel-source. nevertheless, it isn't fixed: [abridged...] piper% dpkg -l ke

Re: flavours and modules: /lib confusion

2001-12-28 Thread Guy Geens
> "martin" == martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: martin> *except*: kernel-image-2.4.17+fishbowl writes its modules to martin> /lib/modules/2.4.17, but e.g. the pcmcia-modules package that martin> i generate puts its modules under martin> /lib/modules/2.4.17+fishbowl. This was a bug i

Re: flavours and modules: /lib confusion

2001-12-28 Thread Neil Spring
from "man make-kpkg": --flavour foo This option is now deprecated in favour of --append_to_version. --append_to_version places modules in the place you expect, and coexists well with modules. I use it all the time. -neil On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 05:25

flavours and modules: /lib confusion

2001-12-27 Thread martin f krafft
hi folks, i am using a separate machine to compile kernels and module packages. the arguments to make-kpkg are --revision with an increasing revision number, and --flavour, where i specify the machine name. the result is e.g. a kernel-image-2.4.17+fishbowl package. now, i am also compiling pcmcia-