On Jul 06, Alexander Vlasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I have some objections:
> 1) first reason is not true anymore. Since
> 2004 SPF has a lot of testing;
Which showed well that it is a bad idea.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Take matters into your own hands. :)
The following is what I used to do to run exim4 4.50 with SPF checking.
I think that the same broad steps will also apply to more recent versions
of the package.
# apt-get install build-essential libspf2-dev fakeroot
# apt-get build-dep exim4
$ apt-get sour
Hello.
I filed a wishlist[1] on exim4 package asking to enable SPF[2] in
exim4-daemon-heavy package, but maintainer rejected it and recommended
me discuss this situation on debian-devel@, so I beg to ask your
attention.
Currently, debian ships two versions of exim4 -- light with absolutely
minima
3 matches
Mail list logo
