Re: enabling LTO by default is vastly inappropriate

2022-07-21 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Adam Borowski dixit: >> These bugs are subtile miscompilations. In mksh, only one test >> by accident fails due to the GCC LTO bug. It’s definitely *not* > >What was the last version of gcc that you have tested? 8, 9 and then-snapshot, i.e. 10 prereleases. So, pretty recent. >> (As for dietlibc,

Re: enabling LTO by default is vastly inappropriate (was Re: Bug#1015386: dietlibc: ftbfs with LTO (link time optimization) enabled)

2022-07-19 Thread Adam Borowski
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 05:15:32PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Matthias Klose dixit: > >The goal is to enable this optimization by default in an upcoming > >Debian release in dpkg-buildflags for 64bit architectures. The goal > >is to get this package to build with link time optimizations, or t

enabling LTO by default is vastly inappropriate (was Re: Bug#1015386: dietlibc: ftbfs with LTO (link time optimization) enabled)

2022-07-19 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Matthias Klose dixit: >The goal is to enable this optimization by default in an upcoming >Debian release in dpkg-buildflags for 64bit architectures. The goal >is to get this package to build with link time optimizations, or to >explicitly disable link time optimizations for this package build. T