Re: dpkg-shlibs and soname

1996-09-18 Thread Christian Schwarz
May be I misunderstood something, but the problem seems to be that /etc/dpkg/shlibs.default doesn't contain some important libraries. In my understanding, the file should contain a list of _all_ *installed* shared libraries on the system and the packages names and versions that provided the share

Re: dpkg-shlibs and soname

1996-09-18 Thread Heiko Schlittermann
Yves Arrouye wrote: : : Is this what we should do or should we use debian/shlibs.local? Also, : if I put an shlibs in one of my packages (libpaper), then install the : package, and do dpkg-shlibs on a package depending on libpaper, the : libpaper dependency is not found. But the programmer manual

Re: dpkg-shlibs and soname

1996-09-18 Thread Heiko Schlittermann
Dale Scheetz wrote: : : On Tue, 17 Sep 1996, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: : : > : > Read dpkg-shlibs ... there's a shlibs.local mentioned. It could be used : > to fix the missing libs in /etc/dpkg/shlibs.default : > : This is correct (and probably the expected method). My question is: Why : aren

Re: dpkg-shlibs and soname

1996-09-18 Thread Yves Arrouye
On Sep 16, 11:26pm, Dale Scheetz wrote: } > If dpkg-shlibs looks into the package names, the point is clear: there is } > no } > libreadline2.0-package:([EMAIL PROTECTED]) } No, I think what the message indicates, is that it is looking for the } dependency information (I suspect in the default fi

Re: dpkg-shlibs and soname

1996-09-17 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Tue, 17 Sep 1996, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > > Read dpkg-shlibs ... there's a shlibs.local mentioned. It could be used > to fix the missing libs in /etc/dpkg/shlibs.default > This is correct (and probably the expected method). My question is: Why aren't the full set of libraries provided i

Re: dpkg-shlibs and soname

1996-09-17 Thread Heiko Schlittermann
Dale Scheetz wrote: : : On Mon, 16 Sep 1996, David Frey wrote: : : > (well the math library linking can be ignored) : > If dpkg-shlibs looks into the package names, the point is clear: there is : > no : > libreadline2.0-package:([EMAIL PROTECTED]) : No, I think what the message indicates, is th

Re: dpkg-shlibs and soname

1996-09-17 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Mon, 16 Sep 1996, David Frey wrote: > Hello Folks, > Hi Ray, > > I'm trying to (re)package rpncalc under the new packaging scheme, but I'm > having problems with dpkg-shlibs and/or the sonames. Rpncalc needs the > readline library to work, which it links with the name libreadline.so.2.0: >

dpkg-shlibs and soname

1996-09-17 Thread David Frey
Hello Folks, Hi Ray, I'm trying to (re)package rpncalc under the new packaging scheme, but I'm having problems with dpkg-shlibs and/or the sonames. Rpncalc needs the readline library to work, which it links with the name libreadline.so.2.0: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ~/C/rpncalc-1.1$ldd rpncalc