On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 03:13:51PM -0500 , Stephen R. Gore wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > apt-get dist-upgrade' does /not/ upgrade perl from 5.004 to 5.005
> > for the same reason it won't upgrade emacs19 to emacs20. They
> > are different packages. The package is perl-5.005_5.005.03 and
>
"Stephen R. Gore" wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > apt-get dist-upgrade' does /not/ upgrade perl from 5.004 to 5.005
> > for the same reason it won't upgrade emacs19 to emacs20. They
> > are different packages. The package is perl-5.005_5.005.03 and
> > not perl_5.005.03, and so the packag
Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> apt-get dist-upgrade' does /not/ upgrade perl from 5.004 to 5.005
> for the same reason it won't upgrade emacs19 to emacs20. They
> are different packages. The package is perl-5.005_5.005.03 and
> not perl_5.005.03, and so the package `name' is perl-5.005 and
> not simp
Now that you mention it, I did the same thing and got the same
result. However, my upgrade worked.
apt-get dist-upgrade' does /not/ upgrade perl from 5.004 to 5.005
for the same reason it won't upgrade emacs19 to emacs20. They
are different packages. The package is perl-5.005_5.005.03 and
not
I've finally succeeded in getting a working potato box by installing
slink base system (using cdrom), but it took 3 tries. I've done this
before (the machine I'm using to write this was installed this way),
but never had this much trouble.
What I discovered was that changing sources.list to point
5 matches
Mail list logo
