Re: Bug#561494: Fwd: devref and policy should agree on where to document tarball repacking

2009-12-18 Thread Russ Allbery
Thibaut Paumard writes: >> 2) most free licenses require to clearly specify modifications to >> licensed work. Deleting files is to be considered a modification of the >> source package, which _is_ the licensed work. >> >> By the same token, I am starting to realise that we should also >> certain

Fwd: devref and policy should agree on where to document tarball repacking

2009-12-18 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Developers , Debian Bug Debian BTS submit Objet : Rép : devref and policy should agree on where to document tarball repacking Le 17 déc. 09 à 17:28, Steve Langasek a écrit : Package: developers-reference Version: 3.4.3 On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 04:45:33PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: Char

Re: devref and policy should agree on where to document tarball repacking

2009-12-18 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le 17 déc. 09 à 17:28, Steve Langasek a écrit : Package: developers-reference Version: 3.4.3 On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 04:45:33PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: Charles Plessy writes: while checking the section 6.7.8.2 of the Developers reference (“Repackaged upstream source”) in the context on

devref and policy should agree on where to document tarball repacking

2009-12-17 Thread Steve Langasek
Package: developers-reference Version: 3.4.3 On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 04:45:33PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Charles Plessy writes: > > while checking the section 6.7.8.2 of the Developers reference > > (“Repackaged upstream source”) in the context on another thread on this > > list > > (http://