Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> Julian Mehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> > > And you think an attitude like this is going to make me work
> > > harder? For *you* ?? Get real.
> >
> > Regardless of whether it was right to NMU sysvinit without you being
> > notifie
On Wed, 02 Jul 2003, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> I accepted maintainership because I am the upstream author, and having
[...]
> In short, I am actively developing the Debian and non-debian parts
> of it. It's just that I happen to do this in bursts, and some people
> get upset when the bursts t
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Julian Mehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>> Tobias Wolter wrote:
>> > I still haven't seen any bugfix from you. How about you go stop
>> > ranting about being treated unfair and DOING YOUR WORK?
>>
>> And you think an attitude like this
Julian Mehnle wrote:
> Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>>Tobias Wolter wrote:
>>>I still haven't seen any bugfix from you. How about you go stop
>>>ranting about being treated unfair and DOING YOUR WORK?
>>And you think an attitude like this is going to make me work
>>harder? For *you* ?? Get real.
>
Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> Tobias Wolter wrote:
> > I still haven't seen any bugfix from you. How about you go stop
> > ranting about being treated unfair and DOING YOUR WORK?
>
> And you think an attitude like this is going to make me work
> harder? For *you* ?? Get real.
Regardless of wheth
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 11:03:53PM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> I had a -5 ready to go at about the same time I saw the NMU. I was so
> annoyed I decided to let the issue go for a couple of days. Cool down
> period.
If it was ready, why not upload it and be done with it? The NMU was
v
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 06:35:50PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
> | Now, did the NMU follow the rules in the developers reference ?
> aj opened[1] the bug hunting season last year.. it hasn't closed yet.
While this is true, Bastian didn't actually follow even the lig
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tobias Wolter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>No. From my point of view, it's an acceptable step out of bounds.
For me it isn't.
>I still haven't seen any bugfix from you. How about you go stop
>ranting about being treated unfair and DOING YOUR WORK?
And you think an
Miquel,
It is certainly true that sysvinit is an important package, and as
such, it requires either frequent care and attention to deal with bugs
(and you have a lot[1] of open bugs against the sysvinit package).
For better or for worse, the release history of sysvinit has not been
one which has b
On 2003-07-01T07:49:20+ (Tuesday), Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Tobias Wolter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2003-06-29T12:40:56+ (Sunday), Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> >> Yes, NMUing essential packages without bothering to contact the
> >> maint
* (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
[...]
| Now, did the NMU follow the rules in the developers reference ?
aj opened[1] the bug hunting season last year.. it hasn't closed yet.
(sure, waldi could have put the NMU in delayed..)
[1]
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2002/debian-devel-anno
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tobias Wolter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 2003-06-29T12:40:56+ (Sunday), Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>
>> Yes, NMUing essential packages without bothering to contact the
>> maintainer is cooperation at work. NOT.
>
>Between pissing off a maintainer and leav
On 2003-06-29T12:40:56+ (Sunday), Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I've received several reports that debootstrap of sid has not been
> >> possible recently due to sysvinit.
> > I've noticed that waldi already did
> >> I've received several reports that debootstrap of sid has not been
> >> possible recently due to sysvinit.
> >
> >I've noticed that waldi already did a NMU.
> >I'm moved. It's free-software and cooperation at work.
>
> Yes, NMUing essential packages without bothering to contact the
> maintain
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I've received several reports that debootstrap of sid has not been
>> possible recently due to sysvinit.
>
>I've noticed that waldi already did a NMU.
>I'm moved. It's free-software and cooperation at work.
Yes, NMUing
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've received several reports that debootstrap of sid has not been
> possible recently due to sysvinit.
> I guess the problem is that sysvinit related postinst
> scripts are calling 'init' inside chroot, which fails,
> failing the whole installation pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 28. Juni 2003 04:09 schrieb Junichi Uekawa:
> Hi,
>
> I've received several reports that debootstrap of sid has not been
> possible recently due to sysvinit.
>
> I guess the problem is that sysvinit related postinst
> scripts are calling 'i
> I've received several reports that debootstrap of sid has not been
> possible recently due to sysvinit.
I've noticed that waldi already did a NMU.
I'm moved. It's free-software and cooperation at work.
excited,
junichi
Hi,
I've received several reports that debootstrap of sid has not been
possible recently due to sysvinit.
I guess the problem is that sysvinit related postinst
scripts are calling 'init' inside chroot, which fails,
failing the whole installation process.
The possible alternatives seem to be:
19 matches
Mail list logo
