On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 07:40:19PM -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> [debiandoc-sgml] now builds PDF and PS output in a bi-stable loop
> (so various Makefiles can now be cleaned up and bug #134701 is closed).
I've no idea about code or what you mean by "bi-stable", so excuse me if I'm
asking a
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> > It might be nice if you could just mass-NMU (maybe to DELAYED/1-day)
> > with Build-Depends updated.
>
> Agree. I was hoping you, the pbuilder dude, may volunteer :)
Hmm... if it's not automatic, things are a bit difficult.
I'm not insi
Hi,
I just uploaded a new version of debiandoc-sgml which has its urgency set to
high to speed up things. It now builds PDF and PS output in a bi-stable loop
(so various Makefiles can now be cleaned up and bug #134701 is closed).
Thanks,
Ardo
Josip Rodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Apr
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 12:07:42AM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> PS: My "Debian reference" in DDP CVS/WEB needs to be packaged. Any
> volunteer? I am not Debian developer.
As I am translating it to Finnish so it is quite natural for me to package
it. Of course, one requirement is that my applica
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 10:59:07PM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Some coordinated rebuild activity may be a good idea for document created
> with known problematic version (1.1.59).
So far I've only heard about the broken installation documentation in
disks-* directory of the FTP archive, and seen it
Kon'nichiwa Umekawa-san (Hi, Mr. Umekawa),
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 03:42:17PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
>
> > Since there seems to be another new debiandoc-sgml coming, it may take
> > few more days before new unstable version (1.1.66?) a
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> Since there seems to be another new debiandoc-sgml coming, it may take
> few more days before new unstable version (1.1.66?) appears into testing.
>
> Some coordinated rebuild activity may be a good idea for document created
> with known pro
Hi folks,
debiandoc-sgml in testing (1.1.59) is known to be very unfriendly to
the current links/lynx. Though the maintainer (Ardo) and I think this
is browser issue, we think it is practical to fix debiandoc-sgml and
build pages with new version. And that is what is happening in unstable
but ha
8 matches
Mail list logo
