On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 12:31:18PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> In that case, one would simply depend on that, and the shell wrapper
> would depend on an |-ed list of the encoders it understood. I still
> don't see that the virtual package could be useful.
Well, I dont see why mp3-encoder is us
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:01:15 +0100
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 11:43:41AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Well, if any program were to actually depend on this virtual package,
> > they'd need to know which encoder was being used in order to correctly
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:01:15PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 11:43:41AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Well, if any program were to actually depend on this virtual package,
> > they'd need to know which encoder was being used in order to correctly
> > support the
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 11:43:41AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Well, if any program were to actually depend on this virtual package,
> they'd need to know which encoder was being used in order to correctly
> support the differing argument conventions. In which case, why not just
> depend on the en
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 02:57:04PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 09:04:36AM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be necessary for this to work for all music encoders to have
> > the same command line interface? I haven't used MP3 encoders for many
> > years, but in t
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 09:04:36AM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>
> Wouldn't it be necessary for this to work for all music encoders to have
> the same command line interface? I haven't used MP3 encoders for many
> years, but in their simple forms, I vaguely recall them to have been at
> least som
su, 2005-02-13 kello 01:22 +0200, Jesus Climent kirjoitti:
> Having no mp3 encoder in the archive, due to possible patent problems, i
> believe it would be a wiser idea to have "music-encoder" as a virtual package
> than "mp3-encoder".
Wouldn't it be necessary for this to work for all music encode
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 01:22:20AM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.6.1.1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Having no mp3 encoder in the archive, due to possible patent problems, i
> believe it would be a wiser idea to have "music-encoder" as a virtual package
> than "mp3-e
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.6.1.1
Severity: wishlist
Having no mp3 encoder in the archive, due to possible patent problems, i
believe it would be a wiser idea to have "music-encoder" as a virtual package
than "mp3-encoder".
Tools that have a Depends: entry on mp3-encoder are:
ecasound
Too
9 matches
Mail list logo
