Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> Further, will transitioning to cdebconf be possible if the only common
> specification is that behind the debconf-2.0 virtual package
> (http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/debconf_specification.html)?
This remains to be seen. The best way to find out would be f
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 02:09:06PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 02:13:18PM +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > dh_installdebconf adds a fixed dependency on debconf (>= 0.5) | debconf-2.0
> > to
> > ${misc:Depends} if debconf is actually needed. But judging from the
> > ch
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 02:13:18PM +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> dh_installdebconf adds a fixed dependency on debconf (>= 0.5) | debconf-2.0
> to
> ${misc:Depends} if debconf is actually needed. But judging from the changelog
> of debconf version 1.2.0 is needed if there are any template trans
dh_installdebconf adds a fixed dependency on debconf (>= 0.5) | debconf-2.0 to
${misc:Depends} if debconf is actually needed. But judging from the changelog
of debconf version 1.2.0 is needed if there are any template translations,
and I think dh_installdebconf should be so smart. Not that it ma
4 matches
Mail list logo
