Re: dcfgtool and clones

1997-06-02 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On Jun 1, Craig Sanders wrote > It should NOT attempt to be some universal replacement for > package-specific config files. i agree. > All that is needed is a set of "key=value" pairs in a plain text file. Take > a look at FreeBSD's /etc/sysconfig or NextStep's /etc/hostconfig for an > example.

Re: dcfgtool and clones

1997-06-02 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On Jun 1, Kai Henningsen wrote > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Sanders) wrote on 01.06.97 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > The config database should be regarded as a convenience for > > {pre,post}{inst,rm} scripts and /etc/init.d/ boot time scripts only. > > Well, that was what started the discussion,

Re: dcfgtool and clones

1997-06-02 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sun, 1 Jun 1997, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > Craig Sanders: > > This is not only simple to implement, but it is also simple to > > parse... > > Not quite so simple. If you need to allow all characters in the > values, which requires using escapes and stuff, and consequently > also makes it more di

Re: dcfgtool and clones

1997-06-01 Thread Peter Tobias
On Jun 1, Kai Henningsen wrote: > 2. We need a general system administration tool. Lots of other Unix and >Unix-like Systems already have those, with varying quality. This thing >should ideally be able to configure everything that is globally >configurable on a Debian system, probably v

Re: dcfgtool and clones

1997-06-01 Thread Kai Henningsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Sanders) wrote on 01.06.97 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The config database should be regarded as a convenience for > {pre,post}{inst,rm} scripts and /etc/init.d/ boot time scripts only. Well, that was what started the discussion, anyway. Then the general-admin- tool stuff

Re: dcfgtool and clones

1997-06-01 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sat, 31 May 1997, Richard G. Roberto wrote: > Well, I promised myself I wasn't going to get involved in this kind of > thing, but I'm about to get a private internet connection so I should > be able to insulate my job from these discussions soon. I would like > to make the following requests of

Re: dcfgtool and clones

1997-05-31 Thread Richard G. Roberto
Well, I promised myself I wasn't going to get involved in this kind of thing, but I'm about to get a private internet connection so I should be able to insulate my job from these discussions soon. I would like to make the following requests of those working on this project: Please do not create a

Re: dcfgtool and clones

1997-05-30 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On May 30, Tom Lees wrote > We are planning on expanding the scope of deity to include a few more > features than "just a GUI" after the initial release though. Including > getting a decent library set together for other developers to use. Making > the config-tool part of this would seem pretty log

Re: dcfgtool and clones

1997-05-30 Thread Tom Lees
On Mon, 26 May 1997, David Frey wrote: > Hello everybody, > > On Sat, May 24 1997 11:40 +0200 Andreas Jellinghaus writes: > > there are three tools : cfgtool (lars wirzenius), nod (winfried > > truemper), dcfgtool (mine). and someone is working on a _real_ tool (all > > three have flaws, and if t

Re: dcfgtool and clones

1997-05-27 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On May 26, David Frey wrote > Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Assuming the syntax is simple, and there's no need for complexity, a > > hand-written parser can be lightning fast, and all the time is spent > > in starting the program, and reading the file. > Mine is currently a lex pa

dcfgtool and clones

1997-05-26 Thread David Frey
Hello everybody, On Sat, May 24 1997 11:40 +0200 Andreas Jellinghaus writes: > there are three tools : cfgtool (lars wirzenius), nod (winfried > truemper), dcfgtool (mine). and someone is working on a _real_ tool (all > three have flaws, and if this way we will get a tool with all good > features)