Re: daemon configuration

1999-10-03 Thread Rick
On Sun, 3 Oct 1999, Michael Stone wrote: > On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 02:59:38AM -0400, Rick wrote: > > I'm uncertain whether this is a good idea or not. I have helped many > > people install redhat linux and, frankly, the daemon enable screen > > confuses them. They don't know what all these thing

Re: daemon configuration

1999-10-03 Thread Raul Miller
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 02:59:38AM -0400, Rick wrote: > I'm uncertain whether this is a good idea or not. I have helped many > people install redhat linux and, frankly, the daemon enable screen > confuses them. They don't know what all these things are or which ones > they may need. If this gets

Re: daemon configuration

1999-10-03 Thread Michael Stone
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 02:59:38AM -0400, Rick wrote: > I'm uncertain whether this is a good idea or not. I have helped many > people install redhat linux and, frankly, the daemon enable screen > confuses them. They don't know what all these things are or which ones > they may need. If this gets

Re: daemon configuration

1999-10-03 Thread Rick
On Sat, 2 Oct 1999, Colin Walters wrote: > On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 10:49:58AM -0700, David Bristel wrote: > > > > > Did you consider his point, though? Why would you install a service > > > if you don't want it to run? > > ones you want. A possible solution would be a "daemon" flag to go on a

daemon configuration

1999-10-02 Thread Colin Walters
On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 10:49:58AM -0700, David Bristel wrote: > > > Did you consider his point, though? Why would you install a service > > if you don't want it to run? > Simple answer here, if you install a group of packages during the install, you > may not realize what packages you have instal