the build-essential and
crossbuild-essential- packages. Or having this done as a
separate source package.
It was designed to be merged, but the version in the repo has the
native bits commented out so is effectively a separate (but rather
similar) source package:
http://people.debian.org/~wookey/b
plans to support such combinations with
> > cross-build-essential?
>
> Multiarch should support this and dpkg-architecture already does. So
> if someone wants to maintain toolchains to do this then adding an
> entry to cross-build-essential is easy. (We didn't put everything
> possi
Simon McVittie writes:
> On 28/06/12 10:17, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Say I want to have the build-essential for i386 installed on amd64.
>> I could install build-essential:i386, replacing gcc/g++:amd64 with
>> gcc/g++:i386. Wouldn't that give me everything needed to cross-compile
>> for i38
plans to support such combinations with
> > cross-build-essential?
>
> It shouldn't differ from compiling for different CPUs: the key problem
> in cross-compilation is "your build system can't run your host system's
> binaries", which you can arrive at e
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:29:20AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 28/06/12 10:17, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Say I want to have the build-essential for i386 installed on amd64.
> > I could install build-essential:i386, replacing gcc/g++:amd64 with
> > gcc/g++:i386. Wouldn't that give me eve
+++ Svante Signell [2012-06-28 11:43 +0200]:
>
> The situation is even more complicated if compiling for different OSes:
> Like as host (build) Linux:i386 and guest (target) kFreeBSD:amd64 or
> Hurd:i386. Any plans to support such combinations with
> cross-build-essential?
M
On 28/06/12 10:43, Svante Signell wrote:
> The situation is even more complicated if compiling for different OSes:
> Like as host (build) Linux:i386 and guest (target) kFreeBSD:amd64 or
> Hurd:i386. Any plans to support such combinations with
> cross-build-essential?
It shouldn&#
el:amd64 contains.
The situation is even more complicated if compiling for different OSes:
Like as host (build) Linux:i386 and guest (target) kFreeBSD:amd64 or
Hurd:i386. Any plans to support such combinations with
cross-build-essential?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ.
On 28/06/12 10:17, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Say I want to have the build-essential for i386 installed on amd64.
> I could install build-essential:i386, replacing gcc/g++:amd64 with
> gcc/g++:i386. Wouldn't that give me everything needed to cross-compile
> for i386?
For evolutions of the same
progress in this area. Thanks to Patrick McDermmot
> (GSOC student) we have a patch to add support to build-essential for a
> crossbuild-essential- packages.
>
> http://odin1.pehjota.net/~pj/debian-bootstrap/build-essential/
>
> The initial patches there add crossbuild-essential pac
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 20:04:26 +0100
Wookey wrote:
> A bit of background here for those who aren't following all the details:
>
> We are working towards having cross-compilers in the archive. The plan
> is for those toolchains to use multiarch so that the existing
> libc: linux-libc-dev: libgcc1:
h to add support to build-essential for a
crossbuild-essential- packages.
http://odin1.pehjota.net/~pj/debian-bootstrap/build-essential/
The initial patches there add crossbuild-essential packages to the
build-essential source, which is easy to do but leads to some questions.
1) Some of the packa
Hi all,
I have not so time available too, but :
- I need a good cross toolchain solution for armel/armhf.
- I use debian on my sheevas and desktops
- I have allready made a port of DoudouLinux Debian based system on
Genesi SmartBook
- I have a lot of others projects still in progress or in standby
+++ Paul Wise [2012-01-21 20:37 +0800]:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Wookey wrote:
>
> > Currently on Debian you'll need to have made the emdebian repositories
> > available because otherwise you won't find any cross-compilers, but
> > hopefully we'll have them in the main archive in the not
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 22:03:11 +0100
Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Le 21/01/2012 16:29, Neil Williams a écrit :
> > The cross-dependency resolution is yet another feature of Debian which
> > is waiting for MultiArch...
>
> While waiting on proper MultiArch in Debian (when will dpkg with
> multiarch p
Le 21/01/2012 16:29, Neil Williams a écrit :
> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 20:37:58 +0800
> Paul Wise wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Wookey wrote:
>>
>>> Currently on Debian you'll need to have made the emdebian repositories
>>> available because otherwise you won't find any cross-compilers
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 20:37:58 +0800
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Wookey wrote:
>
> > Currently on Debian you'll need to have made the emdebian repositories
> > available because otherwise you won't find any cross-compilers, but
> > hopefully we'll have them in the main arch
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Wookey wrote:
> Currently on Debian you'll need to have made the emdebian repositories
> available because otherwise you won't find any cross-compilers, but
> hopefully we'll have them in the main archive in the not-too distant.
Whats the status/blockers for getti
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:10:28 +
Wookey wrote:
> I've thought for a long time that a package like build-essential for
> cross-building would be a really good idea.
>
> Currently to get the right tools and libs installed for cross-building
> you need to do slightly different things on differen
+++ Neil Williams [2012-01-19 13:02 +]:
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:10:28 +
> Wookey wrote:
>
> > I've thought for a long time that a package like build-essential for
> > cross-building would be a really good idea.
>
> +1
>
> It should probably depend on build-essential itself as a starti
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:10:28 +
Wookey wrote:
> I've thought for a long time that a package like build-essential for
> cross-building would be a really good idea.
+1
> Currently to get the right tools and libs installed for cross-building
> you need to do slightly different things on differ
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:10:28PM +, Wookey wrote:
> Having just been looking at sbuild cross-support it becomes clear that
> something like this would be a very useful adititon.
>
> Can anyone see any reason why we shouldn't just have
> $arch-crossbuild-essential which depends on the right
I've thought for a long time that a package like build-essential for
cross-building would be a really good idea.
Currently to get the right tools and libs installed for cross-building
you need to do slightly different things on different distros
Having just been looking at sbuild cross-support i
23 matches
Mail list logo
