Masato Taruishi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adam Heath wrote:
>
> > > On IRC, I was suggested that apt-listbugs should use index.db. I had to
> > > use debbugs .status file too because index.db doesn't have subject.
> > >
> > > apt-listbugs fetches just few static files from web server, two ind
2003年08月28日(?)の01時58分に Adam Heath
wrote:
> > On IRC, I was suggested that apt-listbugs should use index.db. I had to
> > use debbugs .status file too because index.db doesn't have subject.
> >
> > apt-listbugs fetches just few static fi
On 27 Aug 2003, Masato Taruishi wrote:
> On IRC, I was suggested that apt-listbugs should use index.db. I had to
> use debbugs .status file too because index.db doesn't have subject.
>
> apt-listbugs fetches just few static files from web server, two index
> files and .status files of actual criti
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 07:54:07PM +0900, Masato Taruishi wrote:
> On IRC, I was suggested that apt-listbugs should use index.db. I had to
> use debbugs .status file too because index.db doesn't have subject.
I suggest that you generate your own index.db file containing the
subjects you need. Thi
> I was looking at the various stats programs(http://master/mrtg/), and noticed
> that for the last week, master's incoming bw, outgoing bw, and load, have been
> unusually high.
>
> After some digging, I found 2 main causes.
>
> 1: The apt-listbugs author has seemed it nescessary to export all d
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 01:07:04AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Well, correction, cgi.d.o does almost nothing these days. But lists.d.o
> > requires resources pretty much continuously, what with all the mhonarc,
> > glimpse, stats updates and users accessing web pages and its CGI scripts.
> >
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 05:58:24AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Well, correction, cgi.d.o does almost nothing these days. But lists.d.o
> requires resources pretty much continuously, what with all the mhonarc,
> glimpse, stats updates and users accessing web pages and its CGI scripts.
>
> And again
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 06:38:22PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> master runs the bugs.debian.org, cgi.debian.org, and lists.debian.org(the
> web archive, not the mail software). The former are cpu intensive. The
> latter sometimes is, when a search is done.
Well, correction, cgi.d.o does almost not
I was looking at the various stats programs(http://master/mrtg/), and noticed
that for the last week, master's incoming bw, outgoing bw, and load, have been
unusually high.
After some digging, I found 2 main causes.
1: The apt-listbugs author has seemed it nescessary to export all debbugs
data
9 matches
Mail list logo
