Re: chromium-browser in Debian Sid

2010-06-30 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 06:27:43AM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote: > On 06/30/2010 01:18 AM, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: > > On 06/30/2010 06:15 AM, Aaron Toponce wrote: > >> I just noticed that the chromium-browser package releases in Debian > >> GNU/Linux unstable are synced version-for-version with the

Re: chromium-browser in Debian Sid

2010-06-30 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Mi, 30 iun 10, 06:27:43, Aaron Toponce wrote: > > Well, when you put it that way. :) Honestly, I don't think of Sid as a > collection of stable packages. That's what I think about Lenny. I think > of Sid as "the latest and greatest", regardless of version, and that's > why I thought the nightli

Re: chromium-browser in Debian Sid

2010-06-30 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Aaron Toponce wrote: > On 06/30/2010 01:18 AM, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: >> Should we use the Chromium nightly builds ? Really? :) > > Well, when you put it that way. :) Honestly, I don't think of Sid as a > collection of stable packages. That's what I think about Lenny. I think > of Sid as "the l

Re: chromium-browser in Debian Sid

2010-06-30 Thread Aaron Toponce
On 06/30/2010 01:18 AM, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: > On 06/30/2010 06:15 AM, Aaron Toponce wrote: >> I just noticed that the chromium-browser package releases in Debian >> GNU/Linux unstable are synced version-for-version with the google-chrome >> beta package provided by the 3rd party Google Linux r

Re: chromium-browser in Debian Sid

2010-06-30 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:15:11PM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote: > I just noticed that the chromium-browser package releases in Debian > GNU/Linux unstable are synced version-for-version with the google-chrome > beta package provided by the 3rd party Google Linux repository. Is this > intentional? Wh

Re: chromium-browser in Debian Sid

2010-06-30 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
On 06/30/2010 06:15 AM, Aaron Toponce wrote: > I just noticed that the chromium-browser package releases in Debian > GNU/Linux unstable are synced version-for-version with the google-chrome > beta package provided by the 3rd party Google Linux repository. Is this > intentional? No, we follow the s

chromium-browser in Debian Sid

2010-06-29 Thread Aaron Toponce
I just noticed that the chromium-browser package releases in Debian GNU/Linux unstable are synced version-for-version with the google-chrome beta package provided by the 3rd party Google Linux repository. Is this intentional? What's the rationale behind using the beta releases for chromium-browser