Re: checkbashisms: fails to detect shell wrappers

On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 13:40 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Russ Allbery wrote: > > > Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> This sounds more like a report against checkbashisms. > >> I guess it could try to detect these: > > > > See script_is_evil_and_wrong() in lintian's check/

Re: checkbashisms: fails to detect shell wrappers

Russ Allbery wrote: > Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> This sounds more like a report against checkbashisms. >> I guess it could try to detect these: > > See script_is_evil_and_wrong() in lintian's check/scripts. > Based on the next statement on checkbashisms I though they wer

Re: checkbashisms: fails to detect shell wrappers

Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This sounds more like a report against checkbashisms. > I guess it could try to detect these: See script_is_evil_and_wrong() in lintian's check/scripts. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUB

checkbashisms: fails to detect shell wrappers (was: Re: List of packages shipping shell scripts with bashisms + MBF proposal)

Package: devscripts Version: 2.10.13 User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: checkbashisms Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:49:23PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 07:58:05PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> >libguilegtk-1.2-dev >> >> False ala