Re: buildd machines (was Re: Canonical and Debian)

2005-06-07 Thread Blars Blarson
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 06:13:10AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] = >writes: >> >- sparc: one buildd which is not consistently able to keep up with the >> > volume of incoming packages; no backup buildd, no

Re: buildd machines (was Re: Canonical and Debian)

2005-06-07 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 06:13:10AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >- sparc: one buildd which is not consistently able to keep up with the > > volume of incoming packages; no backup buildd, no additional porter > > machine. > Second faster

buildd machines (was Re: Canonical and Debian)

2005-06-07 Thread Blars Blarson
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >- sparc: one buildd which is not consistently able to keep up with the > volume of incoming packages; no backup buildd, no additional porter > machine. Second faster machine has been down, reportedly with disk problems. Even faster repla