Re: build question

On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 07:19:11PM +, michael d. ivey wrote: > my main server is potato. is it "bad" for me to be building packages > there if they are destined for woody? should i start building on a > woody box? You could do source only uploads. Roland -- Roland Bauerschmidt <[EMAIL PRO

Re: build question

David Starner schrieb: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:29:02AM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 07:19:11PM +, michael d. ivey wrote: > > > my main server is potato. is it "bad" for me to be building packages > > > there if they are destined for woody? should i start b

Re: build question

On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:29:02AM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote: > If possible, your package should depend on packages in potato only. > Then users won't be forced to install other unstable packages, > just to try out your package. What if your package won't compile against the libraries in wood

Re: build question

On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:29:02AM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 07:19:11PM +, michael d. ivey wrote: > > i'm a new maintainer, and maybe this is better directed at -mentors, > > or maybe it's in the docs somewhere...if so, just point me that way, > > please. > > >

Re: build question

On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 07:19:11PM +, michael d. ivey wrote: > i'm a new maintainer, and maybe this is better directed at -mentors, > or maybe it's in the docs somewhere...if so, just point me that way, > please. > > my main server is potato. is it "bad" for me to be building packages > there

build question

i'm a new maintainer, and maybe this is better directed at -mentors, or maybe it's in the docs somewhere...if so, just point me that way, please. my main server is potato. is it "bad" for me to be building packages there if they are destined for woody? should i start building on a woody box? --