On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 05:44:53PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Is there no way to (semi) automatically request a rebuild on a buildd?
No. Why would you need that? Having the extra opinion of a porter on
whether or not a binNMU is necessary seems like a good idea to me. After
all, it doesn't
Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 12:45:18PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
The following is a list of packages which are linked against libstdc++5
on some architectures and libstdc++6 on others. This list only contains
packages from Section: base/devel/libdevel/libs/oldlibs, as the f
On 7/24/05, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 12:45:18PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> > The following is a list of packages which are linked against libstdc++5
> > on some architectures and libstdc++6 on others. This list only contains
> > packages from Section: bas
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 12:45:18PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> The following is a list of packages which are linked against libstdc++5
> on some architectures and libstdc++6 on others. This list only contains
> packages from Section: base/devel/libdevel/libs/oldlibs, as the full
> list contains many
Mike Furr wrote:
> These packages were all auto-built with the right version, but the
Wrong. I has to do a binary-NMU for ARM...
> maintainer uploaded a package with the wrong ABI:
> libmyspell3c2 (myspell) [powerpc]
*shrugs*. Fixed.
Grüße/Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian G
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The following is a list of packages which are linked against libstdc++5
on some architectures and libstdc++6 on others. This list only contains
packages from Section: base/devel/libdevel/libs/oldlibs, as the full
list contains many things waiting for
6 matches
Mail list logo
