Re: broken dependencies gphoto2

2002-11-22 Thread christophe barbe
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 08:05:43AM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote: > There is already a bug filed about this: #170292. The maintainer replies: > > "gphoto2 2.1.0 is not compatible with the new libexif in debian/sid. > gphoto2 2.1.1 will be out soon, the package is ready. > I will upload gphoto2 2.1.1

Re: broken dependencies gphoto2

2002-11-22 Thread Craig Dickson
Mathias Klein wrote: > just to let you know: > > +++cut+++ > :# apt-get install gphoto2 > Reading Package Lists... > Building Dependency Tree... > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > distribution

Re: broken dependencies gphoto2

2002-11-22 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:25:54PM +0100, Mathias Klein wrote: > Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: > gphoto2: Depends: libexif5 but it is not installable > +++cut+++ > > Shouldn't gphoto2 depend on libexif7 ? You should file a bug rather than mailing debian-devel. Fortu

broken dependencies gphoto2

2002-11-22 Thread Mathias Klein
Hello, just to let you know: +++cut+++ :# apt-get install gphoto2 Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages hav