On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 07:41:27AM +0900, Iustin Pop wrote:
> Sorry for reviving and old email. To what extend do you think this
> should apply - even at individual package level?
>
> I ask this because of the following: recently I had a 1-1 discussion
> with a co-maintainer of one of my packages,
[Iustin Pop]
> Could/should Debian make it easier for each package to have an own email
> list (i.e. making it easier to have "1-person team maintenance")?
We have {pkg}@packages.debian.org and {srcpkg}@packages.qa.debian.org.
I don't know if mail to these aliases get archived, but at least it is
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 03:48:35PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> - I've made the "private email aliases considered harmful" point [10],
> in a somehow unrelated thread. I ask you to watch out for interactions
> in Debian that could happen only through private email addresses.
> There are
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> Before that, let me highlight that this is the right moment to ramp up
> our efforts for Wheezy. The planned freeze date [1] is June 2012 ---
> only 6 months away
Point of order: June 2012 is, as I write this, 7½ months away.
> - I've made the "private email aliases
4 matches
Mail list logo
