On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 01:06:08AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Also, once the system reboots, depmod is ran too; at that time, it
> provokes no errors, and the system works perfectly afterwards -- yes, I
> tried :-)
Yes, this is true, but if you use initrd (which I use) and the modules.dep
is
Op di 22-04-2003, om 23:38 schreef Herbert Xu:
> Marcel Kolaja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> are only warnings, the generated modules.dep still works.
> >
> > Are you sure? How can depmod generate correct modules.dep if it does not
> > understand the System.map file? If the modules.dep file
Marcel Kolaja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> are only warnings, the generated modules.dep still works.
>
> Are you sure? How can depmod generate correct modules.dep if it does not
> understand the System.map file? If the modules.dep file is really correct,
The dependencies describe relationship
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 08:37:24AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Marcel Kolaja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Well, it looks like a dependency problem in Debian. What do you exactly
> > mean with "recent binutils"? This problem appears on Woody, that means
> > with binutils 2.12.90.0.1-4 and mod
Marcel Kolaja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, it looks like a dependency problem in Debian. What do you exactly
> mean with "recent binutils"? This problem appears on Woody, that means
> with binutils 2.12.90.0.1-4 and modutils 2.4.15-1.
Then this is not the problem. Only the binutils from
On Sun, 20 Apr 2003 09:54:53 +1000,
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>modutils >= 2.4.17 is not available for woody. You
>have two options: 2.4.15 for stable or 2.4.21 for unstable.
>
>This means you would have to recompile 2.4.21.
>
>Recompiling is easy, I have a version at
>http://www.microc
On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 08:34:06PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
> binutils was changed around July 15 2002. Unfortunately the binutils
> Changelog does not mention the change, nor does it say which releases
> of binutils were issued around that time. Does upgrading to modutils
> >= 2.4.17 fix your p
On Sat, 19 Apr 2003 12:07:11 +0200,
Marcel Kolaja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>To debian-devel: Because it is a long time, we have been discussing this
>bug here, and the thread is broken, I remark, we are talking about
>http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200302/msg00349.html.
>
To debian-devel: Because it is a long time, we have been discussing this
bug here, and the thread is broken, I remark, we are talking about
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200302/msg00349.html.
Please, let's return to the problem and let's try to solve it.
On Fri, Apr 11, 20
When using a recent binutils, you need modutils >= 2.4.17. The
binutils team changed the output of the 'nm' command which changed the
contents of System.map.
10 matches
Mail list logo
