Re: attention to bug 321435

2005-09-30 Thread Gerhard Tonn
Gerhard Tonn wrote: Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Please see http://bugs.debian.org/321435. This bug is that gs-gpl fails to work on s390. I recall just seeing a principal s390 developers say he was no longer doing the Debian s390 port. I don't know what effect this has on the bug. This bug is

Re: attention to bug 321435

2005-09-30 Thread Gerhard Tonn
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Please see http://bugs.debian.org/321435. This bug is that gs-gpl fails to work on s390. I recall just seeing a principal s390 developers say he was no longer doing the Debian s390 port. I don't know what effect this has on the bug. This bug is blocking a number of

Re: attention to bug 321435

2005-09-30 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 09:33:09AM -0500, Adam Thornton wrote: > It's not clear to me that the buildd > maintainer's duties exactly are, or, critically, how much time per > week it takes. I'm able to handle the buildds. I already did that some time ago. Bastian

Re: attention to bug 321435

2005-09-30 Thread Adam Thornton
On Sep 30, 2005, at 1:46 AM, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Please see http://bugs.debian.org/321435. This bug is that gs-gpl fails to work on s390. I recall just seeing a principal s390 developers say he was no longer doing the Debian s390 port. I don't know what effect this has on the bug. T

attention to bug 321435

2005-09-29 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Please see http://bugs.debian.org/321435. This bug is that gs-gpl fails to work on s390. I recall just seeing a principal s390 developers say he was no longer doing the Debian s390 port. I don't know what effect this has on the bug. This bug is blocking a number of packages, at the very least,