On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> The page is obsolete, since a month ago that code is already in unstable.
> It's qemu-user only, though, so you can use it to build and run stuff but
> not to debug bootloaders, the kernel or such.
Full aarch64 system emulation is in qemu u
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 05:24:38PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > is there a clear set of instructions
> > somewhere - a wiki page for example - on how to debootstrap an arm64
> > qemu so that even if it's dead slow it's still possible to help out?
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/Arm64
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Wookey wrote:
> The debian-port arm64 rebootstrap is progressing nicely, and we just
> passed 4200 source packages built, with another few hundred
> pending. There are now 2 buildds running.
awesome
> Thus I'd love it if anyone else could help go through the fai
> suggestion, wookey: i'd love to help... but obviously with no
> hardware that's kinda hard: is there a clear set of instructions
> somewhere - a wiki page for example - on how to debootstrap an arm64
> qemu so that even if it's dead slow it's still possible to help out?
https://wiki.debian.org/
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:19:26AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 20:44 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 07:43:18AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:49 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:20:53PM +0
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 20:44 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 07:43:18AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:49 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:20:53PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wo
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 07:43:18AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:49 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:20:53PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > > > Also if anyone has expertise in language portin
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:49 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:20:53PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > > Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
> > > from you. Below is the list of languages we
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:20:53PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
> > from you. Below is the list of languages we believe still need porting to
> > arm64:
>
> Ruby wasn't on the l
Am 15.05.2014 03:10, schrieb Wookey:
> Go (we have gccgo, but not gcgo)
this is not arm64 specific. Debian has a serious problem in that the current Go
maintainers are focused on gc only, which only supports amd64, i386, armhf, and
probably armel.
> Mono
needs porting
> GCL
> CLISP
need porti
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 02:10:39AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> GHCi (ghc is done, but not ghci - is this hard?)
This is hard. You need either an LLVM-based port or a native code
generator, and in either case I think you need some linker support in
GHC. Both of these are serious compiler engineer proj
Le jeudi 15 mai 2014 à 02:10 +0100, Wookey a écrit :
> Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
> from you. Below is the list of languages we believe still need porting to
> arm64:
> Julia
Note that currently Julia is only available on i386/amd64 (so no
armel/armhf for
2014-05-15 02:10 Wookey:
The debian-port arm64 rebootstrap is progressing nicely, and we just
passed 4200 source packages built, with another few hundred
pending. There are now 2 buildds running.
In the course of that 344 have failed to build, (see
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/architect
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 02:10 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear
> from you. Below is the list of languages we believe still need porting to
> arm64:
Ruby wasn't on the list, is that under control?
Ruby seems to be at the bottom of the build-d
The debian-port arm64 rebootstrap is progressing nicely, and we just
passed 4200 source packages built, with another few hundred
pending. There are now 2 buildds running.
In the course of that 344 have failed to build, (see
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/architecture.php?a=arm64&suite=sid
15 matches
Mail list logo
