Re: aptitude removals (was Re: APT 0.7 for sid)

2007-06-10 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 08:13:18PM -0400, Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > Daniel Burrows wrote: > > > Bug #299009 is AFAIK about the fact that aptitude produces different > > dependency resolutions from the visual UI versus the command-line. This > > is because the comma

Re: aptitude removals (was Re: APT 0.7 for sid)

2007-06-10 Thread Felipe Sateler
Daniel Burrows wrote: > Bug #299009 is AFAIK about the fact that aptitude produces different > dependency resolutions from the visual UI versus the command-line. This > is because the command-line has more context about what the user is > doing and tweaks the resolver accordingly. Would you e

Re: aptitude removals (was Re: APT 0.7 for sid)

2007-06-10 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 10:46:37AM -0400, Philippe Cloutier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > > > >Apparently there have been bugs in this for years and no-one reported > >them until they caused trouble for the d-i team several months ago. > >They should be fixed in stable's aptitude now, an

aptitude removals (was Re: APT 0.7 for sid)

2007-06-10 Thread Philippe Cloutier
Apparently there have been bugs in this for years and no-one reported them until they caused trouble for the d-i team several months ago. They should be fixed in stable's aptitude now, and I would appreciate bug reports on any transition problems that remain. FWIW, I thought that you acknowledged