Re: apt-get problems

2003-11-14 Thread Russell Coker
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:54, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 10:59, Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Something in your login chain is setting SIGCHLD to ignore.  Check your > > shell, terminal, etc. > > Thanks for the information. > > I am using pam 0.77 that I

Re: apt-get problems

2003-11-13 Thread Russell Coker
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 10:59, Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Something in your login chain is setting SIGCHLD to ignore.  Check your > shell, terminal, etc. Thanks for the information. I am using pam 0.77 that I compiled myself (Debian is still at 0.76). 0.77 changes the code for running

Re: apt-get problems

2003-11-13 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 10:25:13AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > Below are the errors I am getting from apt-get on some machines running > recent unstable. Is this a known bug or have I screwed up something? http://bugs.debian.org/199653 It would be greatly appreciated if you could track this d

Re: apt-get problems

2003-11-12 Thread Adam Heath
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Russell Coker wrote: > Below are the errors I am getting from apt-get on some machines running recent > unstable. Is this a known bug or have I screwed up something? > > I've tried downgrading libc6 and a few other things but to no avail. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get upda

apt-get problems

2003-11-12 Thread Russell Coker
Below are the errors I am getting from apt-get on some machines running recent unstable. Is this a known bug or have I screwed up something? I've tried downgrading libc6 and a few other things but to no avail. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get update Get:1 http://ftp.monash.edu.au unstable/main Pack