Re: apell

2003-12-07 Thread Henning Glawe
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 03:27:31PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > > if not: why was aspell _removed_ from stable and not replaced by a > > backport of the version in unstable ? > The upgrade to Aspell 0.50 is too big of a change for stable and would > break a ton of stuff. but just removing it doesn'

Re: apell

2003-12-06 Thread Brian Nelson
Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Henning Glawe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Moin, >> what are the "license problems" causing the removal of aspell in the >> update to 3.0r2 ? > > IMO, there are no license problems. See: Actually, I take that back. There was a serious bug in that /

Re: apell

2003-12-06 Thread Brian Nelson
Henning Glawe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Moin, > what are the "license problems" causing the removal of aspell in the > update to 3.0r2 ? IMO, there are no license problems. See: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2003/debian-user-200312/msg00870.html > do these problems exist in debian

apell

2003-12-06 Thread Henning Glawe
Moin, what are the "license problems" causing the removal of aspell in the update to 3.0r2 ? do these problems exist in debian unstable ? if not: why was aspell _removed_ from stable and not replaced by a backport of the version in unstable ? -- c u henning