On May 28, 12:55pm, Joey Hess wrote:
> Buddha Buck:
> > Personally, I question placing them in the main distribution at all
> > (including non-free and contrib). I have nothing wrong with the
> > contents (if available, it would be installed on my system rather
> > quickly), but rather the unwa
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Look at it this way: I don't think any of the man pages mention ASR at all.
> So the only person who is going to connect ASR with the package is someone
> who looks at the package description. Who's most likly to do t
Buddha Buck:
> Personally, I question placing them in the main distribution at all
> (including non-free and contrib). I have nothing wrong with the
> contents (if available, it would be installed on my system rather
> quickly), but rather the unwanted publicity it could cause.
I packaged up s
> I am about to create a package (in fact it's ready) with
> alt.sysadmin.recovery man pages (things like lart, sysadmin, etc.)
> So, first of all I'd like to check if there are no other people working on
> it and if the others think this should be put into Debian.
> And another question - I'm not
On May 26, 10:15am, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Alexander> Such pearls of wisdom need to be what they're done
> Alexander> for... Showing up with man...
>
> Alexander> Nobody will die because of that... Hopefully.
>
> Fine, as long as the desciption field is clear that these
> ``manual pages
'J.H.M.Dassen wrote:'
>
>On May 26, Manoj Srivastava wrote
>> Would the doc directory be better for man pages? Why games?
>
>Check out the manpages at http://www.bofh.net/man/:
>lart - Luser Attitude Readjustment Tool - use a lart to adjust lusers'
>attitudes
>sysadmin - responsible f
Hi,
>>"Alexander" == Alexander Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexander> Such pearls of wisdom need to be what they're done
Alexander> for... Showing up with man...
Alexander> Nobody will die because of that... Hopefully.
Fine, as long as the desciption field is clear that these
``man
On May 26, 1:36pm, Alexander Koch wrote:
> > But doesn't it belong to /usr/man, if it's in groff format?
>
> Such pearls of wisdom need to be what they're done for... Showing up with
> man...
I wrote it once, but it apparently went into wrong place :^)
We're not talking about the location in fil
On 26 May 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Oh, I see. Well, this stuff is then like a joke book, in
> manual page format, and I think that humor should still fit in under
> the doc category (If I remember correctly, that is where the
> consensus was to place books like the bible or older book
Hi,
Oh, I see. Well, this stuff is then like a joke book, in
manual page format, and I think that humor should still fit in under
the doc category (If I remember correctly, that is where the
consensus was to place books like the bible or older books whose
copyrights have expired)
On May 26, Manoj Srivastava wrote
> Would the doc directory be better for man pages? Why games?
Check out the manpages at http://www.bofh.net/man/:
lart - Luser Attitude Readjustment Tool - use a lart to adjust lusers'
attitudes
sysadmin - responsible for everything imaginable that
Hi,
Would the doc directory be better for man pages? Why games?
manoj
confused
--
"Civilisation is the art of living in towns of such size that
everyone does not know everyone else." Julian Jaynes
Manoj Srivastava mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mobile, Alabama USA
I am about to create a package (in fact it's ready) with
alt.sysadmin.recovery man pages (things like lart, sysadmin, etc.)
So, first of all I'd like to check if there are no other people working on
it and if the others think this should be put into Debian.
And another question - I'm not sure if my
13 matches
Mail list logo
