Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>> >> The
>> >> CUPS queues print those thai (?) letters very nicely, it's a PostScript
>> >> printer.
>> >
>> > Not on my computer. The CUPS queues (and default postscript for that
>> > matter) are broke in latest firefox on my system. "Pape
Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Frank wrote:
>> >> The
>> >> CUPS queues print those thai (?) letters very nicely, it's a PostScript
>> >> printer.
>> >
>> > Not on my computer. The CUPS queues (and default postscript for that
>> > matter) are broke in latest firefox on my system. "Pap
Dan writ:
> On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 10:15:36AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > >
> > > Err. You're saying Xprint is the only print implementation that can
> > > print non-latin stuff properly and reliably?
> > >
> >
> > Yes, that's right.
> >
>
> I didn't set Mozilla up with anything special at
Frank wrote:
> >> The
> >> CUPS queues print those thai (?) letters very nicely, it's a PostScript
> >> printer.
> >
> > Not on my computer. The CUPS queues (and default postscript for that
> > matter) are broke in latest firefox on my system. "Paper size not
> > supported", bug #344401. Time to c
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 10:15:36AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 15:23 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > Wouter asked:
> > > > Just out of curiosity, could you point me to arguments in favour of
> > > > Xprint?
Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
>> >> Wouter asked:
>> >> >
>> >> > Just out of curiosity, could you point me to arguments in favour of
>> >> > Xprint?
>> >>
>> >> http://www.dailynews.co.th/
>> >>
>> The
Frank wrote:
> > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> >> Wouter asked:
> >> >
> >> > Just out of curiosity, could you point me to arguments in favour of
> >> > Xprint?
> >>
> >> http://www.dailynews.co.th/
> >>
> The
> CUPS queues print those thai (?) letters very nice
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 15:23 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Wouter asked:
> > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > > > This library isn't truly abandoned by upstream, but essentially it's not
> > > > g
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
>> Wouter asked:
>> > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
>> > > This library isn't truly abandoned by upstream, but essentially it's not
>> > > getting any new dev
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
Wouter asked:
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
This library isn't truly abandoned by upstream, but essentially it's not
getting any new development. Cairo is considered the way fo
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Wouter asked:
> > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > > This library isn't truly abandoned by upstream, but essentially it's not
> > > getting any new development. Cairo is considered the way forward and
Wouter asked:
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > This library isn't truly abandoned by upstream, but essentially it's not
> > getting any new development. Cairo is considered the way forward and xprint
> > is widely (though not universally) considered a broken impl
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> This library isn't truly abandoned by upstream, but essentially it's not
> getting any new development. Cairo is considered the way forward and xprint
> is widely (though not universally) considered a broken implementation.
Just out
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 03:04:50PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > libxaw8 is abandoned upstream and there are no plans to fix it for the Xorg7
> > transition. This is a >= serious bug for any package still build-depending
> > on libxaw8-dev, a
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 07:18:17PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recall that it was announced that libxaw8 should be dropped, but I
> can only find discussions on the X list and
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2006/01/msg00409.html.
>
> Packages are starting to FTBFS because libxaw8
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> libxaw8 is abandoned upstream and there are no plans to fix it for the Xorg7
> transition. This is a >= serious bug for any package still build-depending
> on libxaw8-dev, as they FTBFS and this isn't going to be fixed on the xaw8
> side.
Or, a Debian
clone 365714 -1
reassign -1 xaw3dg-dev
retitle -1 Depends on libxaw8-dev and breaks building packages
thanks
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> My question is now whether to switch away from libxaw8 is a wishlist
>> issue or in fact a fixed plan? What's the appropriate severity for
>>
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 07:18:17PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> I recall that it was announced that libxaw8 should be dropped, but I
> can only find discussions on the X list and
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2006/01/msg00409.html.
> Packages are starting to FTBFS because libxaw8 has not ye
Hi,
I recall that it was announced that libxaw8 should be dropped, but I
can only find discussions on the X list and
http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2006/01/msg00409.html.
Packages are starting to FTBFS because libxaw8 has not yet been adapted
to the new Xorg directories (http://bugs.debian.org
19 matches
Mail list logo
