Re: XF86 betas (Re: D68K: The next step...)

1996-08-02 Thread Mr Stuart Lamble
> Mr Stuart Lamble writes: > >annoyed that if I want support for my W32p (revision A), I have to go > >to 3.1.2E - and it's not available for Debian. Net result: either I > >have proper support for my card, and can't install new X-based packages > >(dpkg barfs at the postinst and configuration stag

XF86 betas (Re: D68K: The next step...)

1996-08-02 Thread Mr Stuart Lamble
llucius wrote: > Actually, I've not gotten to "The Next Step" yet anyway. I finally bit > the bullet and downloaded XFree86 (whew!), compiled it, and am now going > through all the X related packages. Speaking of X, as a member of the beta team (XFree86), I have access to the source code for th

Re: XF86 betas (Re: D68K: The next step...)

1996-08-01 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mr Stuart Lamble writes: >annoyed that if I want support for my W32p (revision A), I have to go >to 3.1.2E - and it's not available for Debian. Net result: either I >have proper support for my card, and can't install new X-based packages >(dpkg barfs at the postinst

Re: XF86 betas (Re: D68K: The next step...)

1996-08-01 Thread Erick Branderhorst
> Speaking of X, as a member of the beta team (XFree86), I have access to > the source code for the XF86 betas. Would it be worthwhile setting up > packages for these in the contrib section? In particular, I'm kind of > annoyed that if I want support for my W32p (revision A), I have to go > to 3.1