> From: Hendrik Sattler
> Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
> Subject: Re: X and non-X packages (Re: Attempts at security)
> Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 18:59:01 +0100
Hallo, Hendrik.
> Am Sonntag 04 Februar 2007 15:36 schrieb Oleg Verych:
>> I'm the one, who do
On 04-Feb-07, 08:36 (CST), Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As there are *-static and non static packages of executable, e2fsck as
> example, i think, it's not very hard to have some other differences,
> such as *-x -nox, etc.
There are a very few packages built -static: all I can find at
Am Sonntag 04 Februar 2007 15:36 schrieb Oleg Verych:
> I'm the one, who don't need X, but emacs21 is linked to some X, even to
> (ugly) 3d scollbars, that i hate. Thus, i whould say it's a *very* big
> disadvantage.
emacs21-nox exists
and that's what I use, too. The X interface is plain ugly and
> From: Lars Wirzenius
> Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
> Subject: Re: Attempts at security
> Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 14:05:30 +
Hallo.
> On la, 2007-02-03 at 12:37 +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
>> > > Not being able to change the cause to the better doesn't mean to
>> > > introd
4 matches
Mail list logo
