Re: What you can do for "Lenny"

2008-10-06 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Tuesday 7 October 2008 02:33, Charles Plessy wrote: > as one of the maintainer of the packages affected by the mass bug filing > named "The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian > packages", I would like to make a comment: > > Most of these bugs can only be exploited by

Re: What you can do for "Lenny"

2008-10-06 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 06:44:49PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl a écrit : > Too many release critical bugs Hi all, as one of the maintainer of the packages affected by the mass bug filing named "The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages", I would like to make

Re: What you can do for "Lenny"

2008-10-06 Thread Clint Adams
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:13:22PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > We do have experimental... It would be better to have a new place for that so we don't need to abuse experimental. Preferably one that moves everything to unstable post-release. Or call it unstable and resurrect 'frozen' for where the

Re: What you can do for "Lenny"

2008-10-06 Thread Luk Claes
Russell Coker wrote: > On Tuesday 07 October 2008 07:25, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Is there any plan to fix things to allow separate uploads to testing and >>> unstable for Lenny+1? >> It's already existing, but we like packages to be tested *before* they >> enter testing... >> >> Mu

Re: What you can do for "Lenny"

2008-10-06 Thread Russell Coker
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 07:25, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there any plan to fix things to allow separate uploads to testing and > > unstable for Lenny+1? > > It's already existing, but we like packages to be tested *before* they > enter testing... > > Much more aggressive remova

Re: What you can do for "Lenny"

2008-10-06 Thread Luk Claes
Russell Coker wrote: > On Tuesday 07 October 2008 03:44, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Oh, and if you could refrain from upload new upstream versions of >> packages to "Sid", you would make all our lives easier. Some reasons: >> >> * New packages won't reach "Lenny" any

Re: What you can do for "Lenny"

2008-10-06 Thread Russell Coker
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 03:44, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh, and if you could refrain from upload new upstream versions of > packages to "Sid", you would make all our lives easier. Some reasons: > > * New packages won't reach "Lenny" anyway. > * Upload new packages