Re: WARNING: Jack Howarth is an agent of destruction

2001-12-30 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 22:40:07 +0100, Anders Jackson wrote: > Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Aren't the brits complaining about the US wanting to execute terrorists, > > because of conflicts with EU declaration of human rights? > (This is of toppic, isn't it) Quite, but still I li

Re: WARNING: Jack Howarth is an agent of destruction

2001-12-29 Thread Anders Jackson
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 10:29:49PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > > The last time I checked the maximum sentence for treason in Great Britain > > was death... > > Hmm, that can't be right. Aren't the brits complaining about the US > wanting to execute terro

Re: WARNING: Jack Howarth is an agent of destruction

2001-12-28 Thread Herbert Xu
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, that can't be right. Aren't the brits complaining about the US > wanting to execute terrorists, because of conflicts with EU declaration > of human rights? But the terrorists (well, except for any British nationals among them) can't be tried for tre

Re: WARNING: Jack Howarth is an agent of destruction

2001-12-28 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 10:29:49PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > The last time I checked the maximum sentence for treason in Great Britain > was death... Hmm, that can't be right. Aren't the brits complaining about the US wanting to execute terrorists, because of conflicts with EU declaration of huma

Re: WARNING: Jack Howarth is an agent of destruction

2001-12-25 Thread adam.edgar
On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 10:29:49PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So let this be a word of warning. Hopefully Mr. Fuchs^WHowarth will > > explain himself, or escape to England where they have less harsh > > penalties for treason. > > The last time I

Re: WARNING: Jack Howarth is an agent of destruction

2001-12-25 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 10:18:37AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote: > This is absurd. You're right about that much. As for everything else... > One of the problems with this Debian policy violation is that > it is not always reproducible as a bug on other folks machines. > However feel free to as

Re: WARNING: Jack Howarth is an agent of destruction

2001-12-25 Thread Jack Howarth
This is absurd. Debian policy explicitly states that you should not create a shared lib using objects not created with -fPIC (which is exactly what libsdl-image does when it asks sdl-config what to use for static_x_extension_libs). This problem is identical to one just resolved in evolution...

Re: WARNING: Jack Howarth is an agent of destruction

2001-12-25 Thread Herbert Xu
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So let this be a word of warning. Hopefully Mr. Fuchs^WHowarth will > explain himself, or escape to England where they have less harsh > penalties for treason. The last time I checked the maximum sentence for treason in Great Britain was death... --