On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 07:44:35PM -0500, Thomas Bliesener arranged a set of
bits into the following:
> Almost the whole Debian website meets the HTML standards except some
> online documentation which seems to be a problem of debiandoc2html
> (#188117).
>
> In a quick survey I found more package
mmendations is
> probably one of those 80/20 things, taking a lot of development effort for
> little user-visible gain)
It depends on what kind of users you use to measure user-visibility,
since W3C recommendations also have something to do with accessibility.
Bye,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 07:38:00AM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> (Personally, I'd vote against a proposal to make it mandatory. We have more
> than enough release-critical issues at the moment - cleaning up
> documentation to conform completely to W3C standards and recommendations is
> probab
On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 19:44:35 -0500, Thomas Bliesener wrote:
> Do you consider the recommendations of the W3 Consortium as binding or
> optional for the Debian project?
I'd say having our documentation conform to W3C standards and
recommendations is desirable, but not a binding requirement. If
Almost the whole Debian website meets the HTML standards except some
online documentation which seems to be a problem of debiandoc2html
(#188117).
In a quick survey I found more packages which generate code which
doesn't pass the check on http://validator.w3.org:
gallery
latex2hmtl
netsaint
squid
5 matches
Mail list logo
