Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> : making it possible for any server that can meet the need to provide the
> : virtual package makes sense. If the best you can think of as a reason to do
> : this for ftpd is to satisfy pre-selection bundling, then I'm not convinced
> : yet.
>
> Ok, so we don't create
On Tue, Apr 14, 1998 at 12:36:09AM -0600, somebody wrote
: : Imagine a package ``internet server'' or a pre-selection called
: : ``internet server'', depending on:
: : httpd, ftpd, ...
: Ok. That almost makes sense. On the other hand, since the stock networking
: stuff provides a functional
On Mon, Apr 13, 1998 at 10:03:46AM -0600, someone wrote:
: Hi Heiko...
:
: What's missing from your proposal is any sense of *why* you want to do this.
:
: : I'd like to create a virtual package name:
:
: : either ftp-server
: : or ftpd
:
: Is there anything that depends on the pres
Hello out there,
I'd like to create a virtual package name:
either ftp-server
or ftpd
since it seems as there are some more ftp server packages possible.
(wu-ftpd (depreciated), wu-ftpd-academ, bero-ftpd (upcoming), proftpd
(???)) ...
What do you think about this.
Additional I'd
4 matches
Mail list logo
