Quoting John Goerzen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I am glad to have discussions take place at Debconf. In-person meetings
> are a great way to brainstorm and reach some consensus. But I am wary
> about decisions being reached there, or in IRC, or wherever only a
> minority of Debian developers can par
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 07:05:17AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> By reading the Debconf5 participant list, I bet that much of these
> will lead to heavy discussions at Debconf and you will have a lot of
> opportunities to debate them. Just remind that one just cannot be as
> rude in real life a
> No, actually, at the time it was released it was presented as a fait
> accompli. After it received a wide expression of distaste and disgust,
That is your point of view and the way you read it. This is not the
way I read it, so it's likely to be a matter of interpretation.
> There has, to date
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 08:23:57AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:08:23PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > >[Josselin Mouette]
> > >> However that won't help the architecture make it to a Vancouver-like
> > >> rele
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:08:23PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >[Josselin Mouette]
> >> However that won't help the architecture make it to a Vancouver-like
> >> release.
> >
> >I suspect you have misunderstood the content and intention o
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>[Josselin Mouette]
>> However that won't help the architecture make it to a Vancouver-like
>> release.
>
>I suspect you have misunderstood the content and intention of the
>proposal from the group meeting in Vancover.
The intent was not at
6 matches
Mail list logo
