On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 11:43:50AM +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> David Starner writes:
> > Instead of each developer chose what packages are and aren't useful
> > to them, why don't we look at the popularity contest? A simple, bias-free
> > way of seperating programs on to the CD's, by actual
On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> David Starner writes:
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 05:59:27PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> > > Nevertheless it is moot point because we are running out of room and
> there
> > > has to be a third CD. It might as well contain all the documents and
David Starner writes:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 05:59:27PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> > Nevertheless it is moot point because we are running out of room and there
> > has to be a third CD. It might as well contain all the documents and
> > other packages non-essential to using an OS.
> >
On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 08:18:04PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 02:51:36AM -0500, David Starner wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 07:28:57AM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > > David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > Instead of each developer chose what packages are and
On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 02:51:36AM -0500, David Starner wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 07:28:57AM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Instead of each developer chose what packages are and aren't useful
> > > to them, why don't we look at the popularity conte
Excerpts from debian: 25-Sep-99 Re: Useless packages (was R.. by David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is there any reason to think it's not correct? More importantly, even
> if it is somewhat wrong, is there any reason to think it's not better
> than what we have?
Well, accurate for the data it gets doesn'
On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 07:28:57AM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Instead of each developer chose what packages are and aren't useful
> > to them, why don't we look at the popularity contest? A simple, bias-free
> > way of seperating programs on to the CD's,
On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 05:59:27PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> Nevertheless it is moot point because we are running out of room and there
> has to be a third CD. It might as well contain all the documents and
> other packages non-essential to using an OS.
>
> Here's another idea. What about
8 matches
Mail list logo
