On Wed, 12 May, 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Please can I encourage anyone posting to -devel-announce to ensure
> that they have set the Reply-To: field to something sensible, and to
> encourage anyone replying to a -devel-announce posting to check where
> they are sending their reply. (Hint: -dev
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Question: would it be worth making -devel-announce a moderated list?
Could we just add some sort of mail filter rule that forces a
Reply-To: to be set, and either adds Reply-To: debian-devel or returns
the mail to the sender with an explanation if none
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 03:24:06PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Question: would it be worth making -devel-announce a moderated list?
absolutely. the logo thread on debian-devel-announce seriously pissed me
off, because i don't filter the -announce lists with procmail.
-vinny
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 03:24:06PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Question: would it be worth making -devel-announce a moderated list?
Yes!
But I wouldn't want to be the moderator... so maybe your suggestion is
enough. Perhaps an auto-moderator, which rejects messages lacking a
Reply-To: header (
4 matches
Mail list logo
