Hi Chris,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 09:26:07AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > I personally admit that getting no response to e-mails is more draining
> > on the patience than waiting for getting a package acceptet.
>
> Perhaps so, but it doesn't quite help when your emails are regularly
> bouncing (w
Dear Andreas,
> I have learned that e-mails to ftp-master work way worse than IRC
> via #debian-ftp.
[…]
> I personally admit that getting no response to e-mails is more draining
> on the patience than waiting for getting a package acceptet.
Perhaps so, but it doesn't quite help when your emails
Hi Holger,
> you didnt mention which package of yours is stuck in NEW, could you
> please elaborate? Else this seems like a rant out of the blue, without
> much checking of facts, like Phil (Hands) thankfully provided.
I was just afraid that things getting wrong seeing a large median number
of ti
Hi Andreas,
> The fact that the NEW queue is continuely growing is a sign that DDs are
> continuosely motivated to fill it up. ;-) As Mattia said in his
> response patience is a feature you learn as DD and it is not a bad
> feature.
Thank you and Mattia for pointing that out.
And it would be be
Ian Jackson wrote:
> > However, after pointing this out to Chris Lamb and re-
> > uploading the package another time he checked and accepted it in less
> > then 24 hours (big thanks again).
>
> It strikes me that if there were comments in the ftpmaster database
> suggestiong the package should be
Dear Lumin,
you didnt mention which package of yours is stuck in NEW, could you
please elaborate? Else this seems like a rant out of the blue, without
much checking of facts, like Phil (Hands) thankfully provided.
I also share wookey's observation that NEW is being processed more
quickly than eve
On 11/04/2018 17:00, Luke W Faraone wrote:
> I reviewed the relevant conversation in #debian-ftp. I think if you
> re-read it, the context makes it pretty clear that it was certainly not
> "laughing off the request" — you said something along the lines of "my
> destiny is sealed" and the response w
On 11/04/18 16:12, Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) wrote:>> On Wed, Apr
11, 2018 at 07:08:21AM +, Lumin wrote:
>>> I'm only a DM and I tried to apply for FTP assistant […]
The 2010[1] and 2017[2] call for help both said that one needs to be a
DD, unless one is solely helping with dak (which is n
On 2018-04-11 16:04, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 07:08:21AM +, Lumin wrote:
Briefly speaking, if a DD was told that "Thank you for your
contribution
to Debian but please wait for at least 2 months so that your package
can enter the archive.", will the DD still be motivated
Dear Lumin,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 07:08:21AM +, Lumin wrote:
> Briefly speaking, if a DD was told that "Thank you for your contribution
> to Debian but please wait for at least 2 months so that your package
> can enter the archive.", will the DD still be motivated working on NEW
> packages??
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 01:21:10PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Gert Wollny writes ("Re: Urging for solution to the slow NEW queue process
> (completeed)"):
> > I might add that in case of the package I was talking about there vtk7,
> > I got another reject because I u
Gert Wollny writes ("Re: Urging for solution to the slow NEW queue process
(completeed)"):
> I might add that in case of the package I was talking about there vtk7,
> I got another reject because I used the same version for the re-
> upload, and after that long time it w
Sorry, hit the wrong button and the email went out incomplete, if yo
read the other mail you can skip to (--).
Am Mittwoch, den 11.04.2018, 13:51 +0200 schrieb Gert Wollny:
> Am Mittwoch, den 11.04.2018, 07:08 + schrieb Lumin:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I'm sorry for repeating this topic in -deve
Am Mittwoch, den 11.04.2018, 07:08 + schrieb Lumin:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm sorry for repeating this topic in -devel without reading all the
> followups in this thread [1] which seems to be dying. Is there
> any conclusion in the thread[1] ?
As the initator of this thread I'd like to chime in. My
>Looking at the oldest item in the queue (node-mimelib, 7 months), I see
>that the upstream README[1] was changed on Mar 11th to read:
>
> NB! This project is deprecated
>
>All users of this project are urged to find an alternative as it is not
>maintained anymore.
>
>Obviously, this is nothing to
On 2018-04-11 10:54 +0200, Philip Hands wrote:
>
> If one excludes the node packages, the current state of NEW looks rather
> good. It suggests[2] that the average wait for non-node packages is
> about a fortnight.
>
> This is something for which I think we should be congratulating the
> ftp-mas
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 11:50:22AM +0200, Xavier wrote:
> > If one excludes the node packages, the current state of NEW looks rather
> > good. It suggests[2] that the average wait for non-node packages is
> > about a fortnight.
> Fortnight is the average of existing package in queue, not average t
On Wed, 2018-04-11 at 07:08 +, Lumin wrote:
> [2] https://ftp-master.debian.org/stat/new-5years.png
Does this graph show the length of the NEW queue over time or the
numbers of packages passing through NEW over time?
Ian.
Le 11/04/2018 à 10:54, Philip Hands a écrit :
> Andrey Rahmatullin writes:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 07:08:21AM +, Lumin wrote:
>>> Briefly speaking, if a DD was told that "Thank you for your contribution
>>> to Debian but please wait for at least 2 months so that your package
>>> can en
Il 11/04/2018 09:44, Andrey Rahmatullin ha scritto:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 07:08:21AM +, Lumin wrote:
>> Briefly speaking, if a DD was told that "Thank you for your contribution
>> to Debian but please wait for at least 2 months so that your package
>> can enter the archive.", will the DD st
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:54:11AM +0200, Philip Hands wrote:
> Andrey Rahmatullin writes:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 07:08:21AM +, Lumin wrote:
> >> Briefly speaking, if a DD was told that "Thank you for your contribution
> >> to Debian but please wait for at least 2 months so that your pack
Andrey Rahmatullin writes:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 07:08:21AM +, Lumin wrote:
>> Briefly speaking, if a DD was told that "Thank you for your contribution
>> to Debian but please wait for at least 2 months so that your package
>> can enter the archive.", will the DD still be motivated workin
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 07:08:21AM +, Lumin wrote:
> Briefly speaking, if a DD was told that "Thank you for your contribution
> to Debian but please wait for at least 2 months so that your package
> can enter the archive.", will the DD still be motivated working on NEW
> packages??? Please conv
Hi folks,
I'm sorry for repeating this topic in -devel without reading all the
followups in this thread [1] which seems to be dying. Is there
any conclusion in the thread[1] ?
Briefly speaking, if a DD was told that "Thank you for your contribution
to Debian but please wait for at least 2 months
24 matches
Mail list logo
