Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Apt on the other hand (wrongfully) tracks explicitly if you have not
>> epoch or an epoch of 0.
>
> Crap. :-( I forgot to remove the explicit zero epoch from my next
> upload. Are you telling me that if I leave no epoch in my following
> upload, ap
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 03:54:27PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> As other people have pointed out later in the thread, my point was
>> that I was _not_ having an epoch with dots in it; my version string
>> was 0:1.2.7:1.2.8-1, which is expli
On 14 Apr 2006, Florian Weimer spake thusly:
> * Manoj Srivastava:
>
>> Not quite correct. Policy has the job of docmenting what is
>> technically correct, and selecting one of a number of equally
>> viable technical options where numerous possibilities exist. The
>> primary purpose of policy is
Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As other people have pointed out later in the thread, my point was
> that I was _not_ having an epoch with dots in it; my version string
> was 0:1.2.7:1.2.8-1, which is explicitly allowed by policy (if there
> is an epoch, then the upstream version
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Manoj Srivastava:
>
>> Not quite correct. Policy has the job of docmenting what is
>> technically correct, and selecting one of a number of equally viable
>> technical options where numerous possibilities exist. The primary
>> purpose of
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 12:36:39PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:08:21AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>>> The problem is the : in your .changes name. The match is:
>>> re_taint_free = re.compile(r"^[-+~/\.\w]+$");
>>> Y
* Manoj Srivastava:
> Not quite correct. Policy has the job of docmenting what is
> technically correct, and selecting one of a number of equally viable
> technical options where numerous possibilities exist. The primary
> purpose of policy is to ensure that diverse packages under dif
* Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060414 14:55]:
> > Policy has (besides other things) the job of documentating current
> > practice.
>
> Not quite correct. Policy has the job of docmenting what is
> technically correct, and selecting one of a number of equally viable
> technical
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Technically, this is not a dpkg-source but because dpkg (and APT) do
> not validate version numbers. Some ISVs rely on this and they use
> forbidden characters in version strings ('_' seems to be quite common,
> for example). And I suspect that there
On 14 Apr 2006, Bernhard R. Link stated:
> * Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060413 06:05]:
A colon is explicitly allowed if the version contains an epoch.
In this case, the build generate file names which contain a
colon, too, and I'd expect them to be rejected in the same ma
* Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060413 06:05]:
> >> A colon is explicitly allowed if the version contains an epoch. In
> >> this case, the build generate file names which contain a colon,
> >> too, and I'd expect them to be rejected in the same manner (they
> >> look essentially the same b
On 12 Apr 2006, Russ Allbery said:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> * Frank Küster:
>>> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Raphael Hertzog:
>
> Edit debian/changelog, and change the ":" by "+" and you're
> probably done.
>
Shouldn't policy be updated to re
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Frank Küster:
>> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> * Raphael Hertzog:
Edit debian/changelog, and change the ":" by "+" and you're probably done.
>>> Shouldn't policy be updated to reflect this?
>> Which part? 5.6.12 already talks a
* Frank Küster:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> * Raphael Hertzog:
>>
>>> Edit debian/changelog, and change the ":" by "+" and you're probably done.
>>
>> Shouldn't policy be updated to reflect this?
>
> Which part? 5.6.12 already talks about that.
A colon is explicitly allowed
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Raphael Hertzog:
>
>> Edit debian/changelog, and change the ":" by "+" and you're probably done.
>
> Shouldn't policy be updated to reflect this?
Which part? 5.6.12 already talks about that.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectrosc
* Raphael Hertzog:
> Edit debian/changelog, and change the ":" by "+" and you're probably done.
Shouldn't policy be updated to reflect this?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Which uses debian/changelog ... the ":" is used to indicate a "period",
> > period can be used to use smaller upstream version if you increased it by
> > error (or if you really need to use an older upstream version).
>
> > The period should be a sing
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 12:36:39PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:08:21AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > > On 10622 March 1977, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > >> I'm trying to upload a new mailman package, but this is f
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:08:21AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > On 10622 March 1977, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>
> >> I'm trying to upload a new mailman package, but this is failing
> >> utterly. Could someone please help me? Thanks in advance.
>
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:08:21AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10622 March 1977, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> I'm trying to upload a new mailman package, but this is failing
>> utterly. Could someone please help me? Thanks in advance.
> The problem is the : in your .changes name. The match i
On 10622 March 1977, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> I'm trying to upload a new mailman package, but this is failing
> utterly. Could someone please help me? Thanks in advance.
Wrong place where you asked. The problem is the : in your .changes
name. The match is: re_taint_free = re.compile(r"^[-+~/\.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:10:39AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to upload a new mailman package, but this is failing
> utterly. Could someone please help me? Thanks in advance.
>
> I'm uploading the exact packages at
> http://people.debian.org/~lmamane/mailman/ with "dput
Hi,
I'm trying to upload a new mailman package, but this is failing
utterly. Could someone please help me? Thanks in advance.
I'm uploading the exact packages at
http://people.debian.org/~lmamane/mailman/ with "dput" to the
anonymous queue on ftp-master. The upload goes well, I see them if I
ftp
23 matches
Mail list logo
