Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 09:55:33PM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
>
> > http://www.debian.org/devel/, "Projects" section:
> >
> > * Debian Web Pages
> [...]
> > * Alioth: Debian GForge
> > Certainly seems that they're listed.
>
> The Debian Usability Research seems to
On Sun, 25 May 2003, Craig Small wrote:
> Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > IPv6 is an official subproject founded by Craig Small, even if we host
> > experimental packages outside Debian for various reasons.
>
> I think that might be way, way too formal for what it is. I'm no
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IPv6 is an official subproject founded by Craig Small, even if we host
> experimental packages outside Debian for various reasons.
I think that might be way, way too formal for what it is. I'm not too
fussed what it is called as it was setup pra
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [1] = "Mono for Debian", ipv6 (is it official or unofficial?),
> "ddtp", ...
IPv6 is an official subproject founded by Craig Small, even if we host
experimental packages outside Debian for various reasons.
Thanks
Fabio
--
Our mission: make I
Em Sat, 24 May 2003 06:11:18 -0400, David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> On Sat, 24 May 2003 10:19:38 +0200
> Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > http://www.debian.org/devel/, "Projects" section:
> > >
> > > * Debian Web Pages
> > [...]
> > > * Alioth: Debian GForge
> >
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 01:58:31PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> > > Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
> > > and many others[1] aren't?
> >
> > You're on crack. http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-desktop/
> >
> > It's hard to discern useful information when you start out by sho
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 10:28:19AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The rules are quite simple: is there someone willing to write those
> pages ? I have this very same problem for DebianEdu, if I want a page on
> www.debian.org I have to prepare it but I have no time for that. I also
> don't have a
On Sat, 24 May 2003 10:19:38 +0200
Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://www.debian.org/devel/, "Projects" section:
> >
> > * Debian Web Pages
> [...]
> > * Alioth: Debian GForge
> > Certainly seems that they're listed.
>
> The Debian Usability Research seems to be missing:
>
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 09:55:33PM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
> http://www.debian.org/devel/, "Projects" section:
>
> * Debian Web Pages
[...]
> * Alioth: Debian GForge
> Certainly seems that they're listed.
The Debian Usability Research seems to be missing:
http://deb-usability.alioth
Le Fri, May 23, 2003 at 02:22:08PM -0300, Gustavo Franco écrivait:
> You didn't understand my affirmation.Debian Desktop is on www.debian.org
> and many others aren't there, for example: "Mono for Debian" and "ipv6".
> What are the rules to be there? AFAIK, there are no documented rules.
The rules
On Fri, 23 May 2003 11:58:45 -0300
Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
> and many others[1] aren't? The Debian Desktop is a good
> initiative, but there are many others that are being
> excluded from the website.I've some ideas:
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 03:01:46PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > That being said, there is certainly a difference between "projects which
> > fork Debian to make a new distro (i.e. providing own versions of existing
> > Debian packages)" vs. "projects which add packages of their own (outside
> >
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 04:56:06PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> I guess that subproject-howto can be the start to 'Debian
> Subproject Guidelines' or 'Debian Subproject Policy'.What do you
> think, Ben?
Sure, it could be a start. The subproject-howto is intended to be a
hands-on guide to creat
On 2003.05.23 16:06, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
> [...]
> Just because nobody proposed it? debian-lex started no so much ago,
> and it was simply somebody proposing it and creating and mantaining
> it.
>
> BTW, apt-get install subproject-howto
Hi,
I guess that subproject-howto can be
El día 23 may 2003, Gustavo Franco escribía:
> Hi,
>
> Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
> and many others[1] aren't? The Debian Desktop is a good
> initiative, but there are many others that are being
> excluded from the website.I've some ideas:
>
> - Guidelines to Debian subp
On 2003.05.23 15:10, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> [...]
> That being said, I do believe we need a better (more comprehensive) list of
> such projects with higher visibility on the web site. But that list will
> likely consist of pointers both to www.d.o and other sites
> (people.debian.org, alioth, a
On 2003.05.23 13:56, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> [...]
> Debian Jr. is a personal subproject[0] within Debian. It is my chosen area
> of focus for Debian, and as such, the only "blessing" I have had from the
> Debian project for it is the little parcel of web space I have for the
> Debian Jr. home p
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 07:37:21PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> The fact a project is hosted somewhere usually imply some special
> relations to his host.
Sure.
> So even if, for Debian people, being hosted on www.debian.org is not a
> reliable indicator, it's highly possible that many persons rel
> I don't think there is any definition for what an "official" Debian
> subproject is. And even if there were, whether it's on www.debian.org or
> not would not be a reliable indicator. I choose to use www.d.o for Debian
> Jr. because it is convenient for me to keep the pages there. Other
> subp
On 2003.05.23 12:51, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:58:45AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
> and many others[1] aren't?
You're on crack. http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-desktop/
It's hard to discern useful information when you s
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 05:51:14PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:58:45AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
> > and many others[1] aren't?
>
> You're on crack. http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-desktop/
>
> It's hard to
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:58:45AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
> and many others[1] aren't? The Debian Desktop is a good
> initiative, but there are many others that are being
> excluded from the website.I've some ideas:
>
> - Guidel
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:58:45AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
> and many others[1] aren't?
You're on crack. http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-desktop/
It's hard to discern useful information when you start out by showing you
haven't done t
Hi,
Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
and many others[1] aren't? The Debian Desktop is a good
initiative, but there are many others that are being
excluded from the website.I've some ideas:
- Guidelines to Debian subprojects (Do you known
what are the official and unofficial su
24 matches
Mail list logo
