Re: Thoughts about including scsiaddgui

2007-09-01 Thread Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
On 29/08/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [a reply to the same message four times] Would you please think before you write so that you don't end up posting four replies in quick succession to the same message? Kthxbye, - Jordi G. H. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Thoughts about including scsiaddgui

2007-08-31 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Reid Priedhorsky wrote: > On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:00:13 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: >> Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: >>> Has there ever been a case where an RFP bug has actually stimulated anyone >>> into packaging a given piece of software? >> Yes, I've closed three RFPs during the last month or so,

Re: Thoughts about including scsiaddgui

2007-08-30 Thread Reid Priedhorsky
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:00:13 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > > Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: >> >> Has there ever been a case where an RFP bug has actually stimulated anyone >> into packaging a given piece of software? > > Yes, I've closed three RFPs during the last month or so, and retitle > another

Re: Thoughts about including scsiaddgui

2007-08-30 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 08:22:36AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: >> Yes. Except that you don't have to go trying to find someone. You should >> file a RFP bug against wnpp and wait until someone has sufficient >> interest and skills to take on the maintenance of this pac

Re: Thoughts about including scsiaddgui

2007-08-30 Thread François Févotte
On 8/30/07, Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has there ever been a case where an RFP bug has actually stimulated anyone > into packaging a given piece of software? Just to add my own little example to those cited before: I recently packaged sqlitebrowser, for which an RFP had been

Re: Thoughts about including scsiaddgui

2007-08-30 Thread Michael Casadevall
Hi, On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 09:43 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 08:22:36AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > Yes. Except that you don't have to go trying to find someone. You should > > file a RFP bug against wnpp and wait until someone has sufficient > > interest and sk

Re: Thoughts about including scsiaddgui

2007-08-30 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:43:46 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > Has there ever been a case where an RFP bug has actually stimulated anyone > into packaging a given piece of software? IIRC I have packaged a few perl modules which had RFPs. That's one of the goals of the Debian Perl Group [0] alt

Re: Thoughts about including scsiaddgui

2007-08-30 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 09:43:46AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > Has there ever been a case where an RFP bug has actually stimulated anyone > into packaging a given piece of software? I packaged TenDRA as a result of an RFP (this predated using the BTS for WNPP). I'd just packaged it for

Re: Thoughts about including scsiaddgui

2007-08-30 Thread Ben Finney
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Has there ever been a case where an RFP bug has actually stimulated > anyone into packaging a given piece of software? The pattern I usually see is that the RFP is a signal that somebody wants it to be done, and when someone steps up with an IT

Re: Thoughts about including scsiaddgui

2007-08-30 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 08:22:36AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > Yes. Except that you don't have to go trying to find someone. You should > file a RFP bug against wnpp and wait until someone has sufficient > interest and skills to take on the maintenance of this package in > Debian. Has there ever

Re: Thoughts about including scsiaddgui

2007-08-30 Thread Neil Williams
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:26:58 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > If you are going to be the Debian Maintainer for this package, you > > should be able to at least understand error reports from the package > > which is very difficult if you don't un

Re: Thoughts about including scsiaddgui

2007-08-29 Thread icelinux
Regarding lazy, it appears that those of this opinion have never created a distro. Indeed I am currently: 1) maintaining the project website 2) building the isos 3) uploading the isos for distribution 4) gathering lists of packages to include 5) searching for software missing in Debian which us

Re: Thoughts about including scsiaddgui

2007-08-29 Thread icelinux
Quoting Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: It's pretty simple, really. If you want to maintain packages in Debian, at least pretend to want to understand the package and pretend to want to support them through a stable release. Saying up front that you're too lazy to do even minimal support isn'

Re: Thoughts about including scsiaddgui

2007-08-29 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >If you are going to be the Debian Maintainer for this package, you > >should be able to at least understand error reports from the package > >which is very difficult if you don't understand the i

Re: Thoughts about including scsiaddgui

2007-08-29 Thread icelinux
Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: PS. Of course you do not have time, you run off eveyone who wants to help. "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." Albert Einstein -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Re: Thoughts about including scsiaddgui

2007-08-29 Thread icelinux
Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:42:26 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > If you are going to be the Debian Maintainer for this package, you > should be able to at least understand error reports from the package > which

Re: Thoughts about including scsiaddgui

2007-08-29 Thread Neil Williams
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:42:26 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > If you are going to be the Debian Maintainer for this package, you > > should be able to at least understand error reports from the package > > which is very difficult if you don't under

Re: Thoughts about including scsiaddgui

2007-08-29 Thread icelinux
Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: If you are going to be the Debian Maintainer for this package, you should be able to at least understand error reports from the package which is very difficult if you don't understand the interpreter output in the case of python. Consider the followin

Re: Thoughts about including scsiaddgui

2007-08-29 Thread icelinux
Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: If you are going to be the Debian Maintainer for this package, you should be able to at least understand error reports from the package which is very difficult if you don't understand the interpreter output in the case of python. So if I am able to

Re: Thoughts about including scsiaddgui

2007-08-29 Thread icelinux
Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: If you are going to be the Debian Maintainer for this package, you should be able to at least understand error reports from the package which is very difficult if you don't understand the interpreter output in the case of python. If you are not going to

Re: Thoughts about including scsiaddgui

2007-08-29 Thread Neil Williams
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:42:01 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > How does everyone feel about adding the software scsiaddgui to > Debian. If you are going to be the Debian Maintainer for this package, you should be able to at least understand error reports from the package which is very

Thoughts about including scsiaddgui

2007-08-29 Thread icelinux
Hi, How does everyone feel about adding the software scsiaddgui to Debian. I cannot find anything that provides similar functionality, and if there is such a tool it is most likely Gnome or Kde specific. I have spoken with the person who has written the software and he said he would help