On 08/04/2010 14:33, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> Hm, making git-core a dummy/transitional package, which pulls the "git"
>> package
>> on upgrades sounds like a better idea to me.
>> Otherwise git won't be updated when going from lenny to squeeze.
>
> Gerr
Joey Hess wrote:
> You forgot to include packages that Suggest git-core in the list.
The only package with a versioned Suggest of git-core I found was
moap, which I did include. Still, I wouldn’t be surprised if I missed
something for some other reason.
For what it’s worth, the list of affected
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> A list of affected packages follows.
You forgot to include packages that Suggest git-core in the list.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Michael,
Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hm, making git-core a dummy/transitional package, which pulls the "git"
> package
> on upgrades sounds like a better idea to me.
> Otherwise git won't be updated when going from lenny to squeeze.
Gerrit Pape implemented what I think is a nicer method: git-core
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 23:10:31 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
>> Now that there is a package available to test with, I would like to
>> file bugs for the affected packages suggesting this change. I suggest
>> an RC severity since it would be nice to have the name change
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 23:10:31 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Now that there is a package available to test with, I would like to
> file bugs for the affected packages suggesting this change. I suggest
> an RC severity since it would be nice to have the name change in
> squeeze. I am therefor
Hello,
Gerrit Pape wrote:
> I'm about to provide a new git binary package from the git-core (the
> distributed revision control system) source, so that 'apt-get install
> git' installs the git content tracker in squeeze.
A new version 1.7.0.4-2~exp0 of git has been uploaded to experimental,
with
7 matches
Mail list logo
