Re: Symlinking /usr/share/doc/ is not allowed

2003-06-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 02:32:12PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 08:00:21PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > I don't see any objection to symlinking if both packages are created of > > the same sourcepackage, the second one depends on =first-package-version > > and (natur

Re: Symlinking /usr/share/doc/ is not allowed

2003-05-21 Thread Andreas Barth
* Brian May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030521 02:35]: > On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 08:00:21PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > The policy vetoe to symlinking intends (in my interpretation) two > > goals. One is to ensure that the licences don't "change" unintendidly. > > This could e.g. happen if there is a

Re: Symlinking /usr/share/doc/ is not allowed

2003-05-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 10:02:01AM +1000, Brian May wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 08:00:21PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > The policy vetoe to symlinking intends (in my interpretation) two > > goals. One is to ensure that the licences don't "change" unintendidly. > > This could e.g. happen if

Re: Symlinking /usr/share/doc/ is not allowed

2003-05-20 Thread Brian May
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 08:00:21PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > The policy vetoe to symlinking intends (in my interpretation) two > goals. One is to ensure that the licences don't "change" unintendidly. > This could e.g. happen if there is a global file called GPL, the > packages link there copyri

Re: Symlinking /usr/share/doc/ is not allowed

2003-05-20 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 08:00:21PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > I don't see any objection to symlinking if both packages are created of > the same sourcepackage, the second one depends on =first-package-version > and (naturally) have the same copyright. It makes it impossible to extract the chan

Re: Symlinking /usr/share/doc/ is not allowed

2003-05-20 Thread Andreas Barth
* Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030520 19:20]: > Several packages in Debian depend on another package and symlink their > /usr/share/doc/ to the directory of this other package. > > Section 13.5. of your policy says: > > <-- snip --> > > 13.5. Copyright information > --

Re: Symlinking /usr/share/doc/ is not allowed

2003-05-20 Thread Gergely Nagy
> Unless someone can convince me that my interpretation of your policy is > wrong I'll start filing bugs against packages that symlink > /usr/share/doc/ to the directory of another package. Policy 13.3 says: ... `/usr/share/doc/' may be a symbolic link to another directory in `/usr/sha

Symlinking /usr/share/doc/ is not allowed

2003-05-20 Thread Adrian Bunk
Several packages in Debian depend on another package and symlink their /usr/share/doc/ to the directory of this other package. Section 13.5. of your policy says: <-- snip --> 13.5. Copyright information --- Every package must be accompanied by a verbatim copy of