On Tue, 24 Jun 1997, Philip Hands wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that during this discussion two issues that are not intrinsically
> related keep on getting tied together:
>
> 1) Reliable file locking, including over NFS
>
> 2) Reliable mail delivery to users' inboxes
>
> I cannot claim to be a
On Tue, 24 Jun 1997, Philip Hands wrote:
[...]
> I think we need to write two libraries:
>
> 1) libnfslock(or whatever)
>
> 2) libmailaccess (or whatever)
>
> libmailaccess should be something like PAM for mail delivery, providing
> access
> to a user's mailbox by use of e
Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> libmailaccess should be something like PAM for mail delivery,
> providing access to a user's mailbox by use of either Maildir, or
> dot-locking (via libnfslock say), or whatever other method --- as
> selected by the user.
Sounds good to me.
--
Rob
--
Hi,
I noticed that during this discussion two issues that are not intrinsically
related keep on getting tied together:
1) Reliable file locking, including over NFS
2) Reliable mail delivery to users' inboxes
I cannot claim to be an expert on NFS locking, but I have a fairly strong
feeling t
> "Christian" == Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Christian> - Karl's "LockFile.pm"--a Perl implementation of
Christian> publib's lockfile (see
Christian> http://inetarena.com/~karlheg/Public)
It's not there anymore; I guess I can put it back up though. I'm not
reall
Hi folks!
I'm glad that so many people are finally involved in our "file locking
discussion". However, we had lots of discussions about this topic in the
past and we have no results, yet.
That's why I want to try to bring more "structure" into the discussion.
(Please complain if you don't agree
6 matches
Mail list logo
